• Problems in Roman Catholic Theology

    As a Reformed Protestant, it should be no surprise that I have numerous problems with Roman Catholic theology. We actually agree on some things, such as the Real Presence of Christ in communion. Roman Catholics describe this process as transubstantiation whereas I prefer to keep it a mystery and eschew the outdated Aristotelian categories of accidence and substance. I also agree with Roman Catholics that all forms of birth control are Satanic. And I agree that abortion is sinful. So next, I’ll briefly go over some areas of Catholic Theology where I have the strongest disagreements.

    Hamartiology

    Here I discuss how Roman Catholic theology deals with sin. Catholics believe a person’s water baptism (which regenerates them) cleanses them of their sins and puts them in a state of grace. Were they to die in a state of grace they’d go to either Heaven or Purgatory. However, if someone sins and it’s serious enough (mortal sin) and they die not in a state of grace they will go to Hell, irrespective of their degree of sanctification and their walk with Christ. I disagree with the venial (minor) and mortal (major) sin distinction. I don’t find it to be biblical. All sin is serious, and even the least serious of sins can still send a person to Hell. Catholic theology does not adequately understand what Christ did on the cross. As a perfect propitiation for our sins, Christ paid the price of all of our sins, not just our past sins before we got regenerated, not just our current sins, but all of our sins including our future sins. I also disagree strongly with Roman Catholic theology that a believer can lose their salvation. In the lifetime of a typical Catholic, they will lose and regain their salvation in an almost endless cycle until they finally die. So they could repeat this cycle hundreds or even thousands of times! This undercuts the sufficiency of Christ’s atonement on the cross for us sinners.

    Monarchical Episcopacy

    There was no regal system of ecclesiastical power in the Roman Catholic church with the pope as the absolute head, until the 4th century when the state and church powers became closely enmeshed. There also were no cardinals. Roman Catholic theology claims this existed since the very early church in the 1st century AD. This claim is without historical proof.

    Papal Supremacy

    The office of the pope is extremely problematic. There is no support in Scripture for what is in effect a super bishop with supreme and unchallengeable authority, and possessing universal jurisdiction over the entire church. The early church was collegial with a 5 person pentarchy. One for each of the major cities where Christians were represented in the Roman Empire. There is nothing in Scripture that says that the bishop of Rome is to be in charge of all other bishops. Christ in Matthew 24 did not build His church on a fallible human being as Catholic theology asserts. Christ’s church was built on Peter’s confession that Christ is the rock. The majority of Church Fathers agree with this interpretation. A minority favor the Roman Catholic position. The Pentarchy consisted of the five ancient patriarchates of the undivided Church of the first millennium of her history, including the Churches of Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem. The apostle Peter was the bishop of Antioch, not Rome. The Eastern Orthodox church can make a very strong case that Rome did not exercise authority over the Eastern church.

    Communion of the Saints

    In Roman Catholic theology the saints in Heaven make intercession for us to God. They act as relays conveying requests from us on earth to God in Heaven. This doctrine has several problems. First, there is no evidence in Scripture that those who have died in Christ can hear our prayers (let alone thousands or even millions of prayers simultaneously). Second, it is unnecessary since Christ opened up direct access to God the Father for us. We are to pray in Christ’s Name and Father God will hear us. In my understanding, the saints in Heaven (and Scripture says all of us who are in Christ are saints) are praising and glorifying God continuously.

    Mary as Mediator

    In Roman Catholic theology, there are 3 types of worship: latria (for God alone), dulia (for the saints in Heaven), and hyperdulia (for Mary). These different types of worship are unbiblical. God alone is to be worshipped and venerated. Mary is a mere creature, she is not divine. Catholics view Mary as a mediator between us one earth and God in Heaven. It’s akin to the intercession of the saints we just described. However, Mary’s role is elevated. Her prayers on our behalf are considered especially efficacious for her unique position as the Mother of Christ the Lord. Unlike some Protestants, I have no problem with the title Mother of God. The logic is that Jesus is obligated to honor his mother and will not refuse her petitions on our behalf. Catholics cite the Wedding at Cana miracle (Christ’s first miracle of His public ministry) as proof that Christ will not refuse his mother. There are obvious problems with this logic. It is also blasphemous as it has Christ the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, the living Word of God, beholden and subservient to His mother. Jesus respected His mother the same as any other Jewish male was expected to. He did not elevate her to a special status, nor is it true that Christ cannot refuse our requests. We can go boldly directly to Christ with our petitions. We need no intermediaries, no matter their closeness to Christ.

    For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus

    1 Timothy 2:5

    The Immaculate Conception of Mary

    Roman Catholic theology teaches that Christ was not the only sinless human to ever walk the earth. Mary too, it asserts, was sinless! She was apparently saved from original sin defiling her at the moment of her conception. The rationale given is that Christ the perfect Messiah could not have entered the world through the womb of a sinful woman. There are several problems with this doctrine. First, there is no logical necessity that Mary is sinless to bear a sinless child. Mary, a sinless child, came forth from sinful parents, so by their own logic why can’t a sinless Christ come forth from a sinful Mary? It is also blasphemous to assert that any other human has the same unique status which Christ does. Scripture is clear that all men are sinners.

    If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.

    1 John 1:8

    Well then, should we conclude that we Jews are better than others? No, not at all, for we have already shown that all people, whether Jews or Gentiles, are under the power of sin. As the Scriptures say,

    “No one is righteous—
        not even one.
     No one is truly wise;
        no one is seeking God.
     All have turned away;
        all have become useless.
    No one does good,
        not a single one.”
     “Their talk is foul, like the stench from an open grave.
        Their tongues are filled with lies.”
    “Snake venom drips from their lips.”
         “Their mouths are full of cursing and bitterness.”
     “They rush to commit murder.
         Destruction and misery always follow them.
     They don’t know where to find peace.”
         “They have no fear of God at all.”

    Obviously, the law applies to those to whom it was given, for its purpose is to keep people from having excuses, and to show that the entire world is guilty before God. For no one can ever be made right with God by doing what the law commands. The law simply shows us how sinful we are.

    Romans 3:9-20

    The Ever Virginity of Mary

    Roman Catholic theology teaches that Mary was a virgin before, during, and after bearing Jesus and that she and Joseph has no offspring together after Jesus was born. This is directly contradicted by more than a few Scriptures which explicitly mention the brothers and sisters of Jesus. I’ve seen many Catholics bristle in disgust at the mere thought that Joseph and Mary had children after Jesus was born like any other normal healthy Jewish couple! This shows how unbiblical their thinking is when it comes to marrying. Sex between husband and wife is good and is not sinful. The creation mandate set forth by God is that man be fruitful and multiply. See Matt. 12:46; 13:55; Mark 6:3; John 2:12; 7:3, 5, 10; Acts 1:14; 1 Cor. 9:5; Gal. 1:19. So this notion that Mary was a perpetual virgin is absolutely false. Scripture even explicitly mentions that Mary and Joseph had conjugal relations after Jesus was born.

    When Joseph awoke from sleep he did what the angel of the Lord told him. He took his wife, 1:25 but did not have marital relations with her until she gave birth to a son, whom he called Jesus.

    Matthew 1:24,25

    The Assumption of Mary

    Roman Catholic theology further teaches that at the end of her natural life Mary was assumed bodily into Heaven. There is disagreement on whether she was actually alive or dead when this happened. This doctrine is without biblical support.

    Infallible Magisterium

    The Roman Catholic church teaches that the teaching authority of the church (the Magisterium) is infallible. There is nothing in Scripture that indicates or promises our interpretation of Scripture will be protected from error and is infallible. By our very nature, we see through a glass darkly. We are fallible people. I believe the clear and direct meaning of Scripture can be discerned by anyone who is literate, by following good hermeneutical principles. I believe we can have confidence we get the majority of biblical theology correct. But there is still the chance we could be wrong in our interpretation of certain parts of Scripture. The fact is that we all have a magisterium. Rome’s magisterium is the teachings of the various popes throughout history, the opinions of the Church Fathers, and the beliefs of the bishops. It is this select group of fallible men that the Roman Catholic church trusts. We Reformed also have a magisterium of the theology of the magisterial Reformers, certainly respected theologians whether ancient or contemporary, our pastors, elders, and our seminary professors. But we have a distinct difference with Roman Catholics. We believe in Sola Scriptura, that Scripture is the highest and our only infallible authority. Rome has no such guiding structure to inform their theology. They rely heavily on tradition.

    Role of Tradition

    Roman Catholic theology places Tradition on the same level of authority as Scripture. This is obviously problematic. There is no such teaching in Scripture. What is really being elevated is the fallible traditions of men (man-made). By placing Tradition on such a high level all manner of unbiblical practices has crept into the church. I have challenged Catholics to name one Tradition that they can demonstrate can be directly traced to an Apostle. Catholics claim there are many things the Apostles and even Jesus taught which were passed on orally and never written down. There is no way to verify or differentiate true from false teaching in this scheme. Plus we know from Scripture that when we are told to hold fast to tradition it is describing what was written down under the divine inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Jesus said we can make the Word of God of no effect by our traditions (cf. Mark 7:13).

    Apocrypha

    The so-called deuterocanonical are disputed books (7 additional books beside the 66 books Protestant canon) which the Roman Catholic church includes in their canon, and Protestants do not. I have read these books and they are clearly not inspired by Scripture. They contain historical inaccuracies, contradictions, and blasphemous heresies such as the prayers for the dead. We Reformed absolutely reject these. We favor the 66 books biblical canon which the Jews attested to. It is claimed by Roman Catholic apologetics that Jesus and the Apostles quoted from the Septuagint (the Old Testament translated from Hebrew to Greek). But there were different versions of the Septuagint and the one Christ used did not contain the spurious Apocrypha! Further, no book written in Greek was ever accepted by the Jews. See the council of Jamnia.

    Purgatory

    Roman Catholic theology teaches that there are two possible destinations or states for a person when they die. They will either go to Heaven, or to a place called purgatory. So named because in this place their sins’ corrosive effect on their soul is purged away. This doctrine is absolutely unbiblical. It is an affront on the sufficiency of Christ’s sacrifice on the cross for our sins! Scripture is clear that for a believer in Christ to be absent the body, is to be present with the Lord.

    Exclusivity

    The Roman Catholic church teaches that it is the one true church. And that Protestants belong to “ecclesial communities” which are inferior to the Catholic church, and which are not themselves legitimate churches. This is absolutely cult-like teaching! We Reformed believe in the invisible Church. It is comprised of all those who have been regenerated by grace alone through faith alone whether they belong to Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, or Protestant churches. Many are called but few are chosen Scripture says. Broad is the path to damnation, and narrow the one to salvation. The sad reality is that the vast majority of people who make up the institutional church are Hellbound false converts who were never regenerated!

    Justification

    We Reformed believe justification is the moment God declares a sinner righteous based solely on Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. This happens through double imputation (penal substitutionary atonement). Our sins are imputed to Christ, and His perfect righteousness is imputed to us. This act is forensic and juridical. It is a one-time act. Roman Catholic theology, on the other hand, teaches that justification is both an act and a process. Final justification, in their view, doesn’t happen until they died and their good works are weighed in judgment by Christ. This teaching is absolutely unbiblical. One major problem in Roman Catholic theology is that it conflates justification with sanctification. Sanctification is the lifelong process whereby God sanctifies us and we are made holy. It is distinct from justification.

    Conclusion

    I have presented my main contentions with Roman Catholic theology. It is clear that, in many points, Roman Catholic theology departs from the sound teaching of the Scriptures. This heresy must be strongly opposed. I still recognize select Roman Catholics as my brothers and sisters in Christ (just as I recognize select Eastern Orthodox and even select Protestants), but as a church, in the sense that it continues, via Trent, to anathematize the true gospel of salvation by grace alone through faith alone, it constitutes a false church in direct opposition to God’s Word. If you’d like to give feedback (whether positive or negative) please post a comment below. Thank you.

  • Atrocities in Ukraine

    I just read this press announcement by the Russian Foreign Ministry! It seems the Zelenskyy nationalist government of Ukraine is using banned weapons to attack the 2 breakaway regions of DPR and LPR! They’ve killed over 13,000 civilians in these regions and destroyed numerous homes and buildings in the past 8 years. The “Zelenskyy is a brave hero representing righteous Ukraine” is a false narrative! Stop being brainwashed by Western biased media! The Ukrainian government is the aggressor, not Russia! Russia is defending its citizens.

    14 March 2022 19:34
    Russian Foreign Ministry statement on Ukraine’s strike on Donetsk
    506-14-03-2022

    At 11:30 am on March 14, Ukrainian forces hit a residential neighbourhood in Donetsk with a Tochka-U tactical missile with a cluster munition warhead prohibited under international law. Although intercepted by air defence, preventing catastrophic losses, the downed missile still landed on the peaceful city and killed 20 and seriously wounded 28 people, including children, women and seniors.

    The DPR leadership has called it an act of terror.

    Such strikes are sanctioned by the country’s leadership at the highest level. We strongly condemn this atrocity committed by the Kiev regime. It confirms again that the nationalist government of Ukraine intends to continue waging war on the civilians of the DPR and the LPR, as it has already been doing with its punitive operation in Donbass for the last eight years. Kiev has apparently decided to launch missiles at completely innocent people as revenge for its defeats during Russia’s special military operation to defend the DPR and the LPR. We are clearly witnessing the death throes of the Ukrainian authorities.

    On behalf of the people and leadership of our country, the Foreign Ministry conveys its deep condolences to the families and friends of the dead, as well as to the government of the Donetsk People’s Republic, and wishes a speedy recovery to the wounded. We are confident that this crime against humanity will not go unpunished.

    https://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/spokesman/official_statement/1804180/

    After the dissolution of the USSR, the United States promised Russia that NATO would not expand any closer to the Russian border. Yet in June of 2020, Ukraine joined NATO’s “enhanced opportunity partner interoperability program”. While this is not the same as becoming a member of NATO, it gives NATO a specific interest in Ukraine, and it is difficult to conceive that this can be anything but concerning to Russia, which cannot possibly welcome even an increased cultural pressure from the decadent West, let alone an increasing military and economic threat. It is Ukraine who provoked Russia to respond, at the behest of America and EU, the NATO powers!

  • Mental illness and America

    Sadly, in our American society, even though it’s the 21st century, there is still a strong and harsh stigma for people suffering from mental illness. In the minds of many people the mentally ill are freaks, perverts, are very dangerous, and they feel the mentally ill should be locked away in mental hospitals to “protect” society. Such antiquated thinking is sadly still widespread. Ignorance of mental health issues is vast and pervasive. Even many college-educated people have a very poor understanding of mental illness. There is also, I’ve noticed, far too often a lack of empathy and compassion. Tragically, I must say this holds true for the majority of Christians. It’s not uncommon for pastors to teach their congregations that mental illness is a sin issue and must be addressed strictly in a spiritual manner. It eschews psychiatric medications or secular therapies. Numerous Christians even believe in the medieval idea that mental illness is a manifestation of demonic activity.

    When many people think about mental illness they have negative associations based around it. They may associate mental illness with serial killers, mass shooters, and other sociopaths. The fact is that the vast majority of people suffering from mental illness will never exhibit any violence. The media and entertainment industry are a major reason for stigma for the people suffering from mental illness, with sensationalistic reporting which focuses almost exclusively on negative news reports, and never positive ones, when it comes to people with mental illness. And in movies and TV shows the villain is often portrayed as someone who is mentally unbalanced if not suffering from outright mental illness. Here is a good paper on the topic of violence among the mentally ill.

    People suffering from mental illness have a wide variety of social issues that they deal with which makes their lives more difficult, especially those who have severe mental illness as I do. Many women, even Christian women, want nothing to do with a man who suffers from mental illness. If the man suffered from diabetes or some other ailment the woman would not think twice about it. But because we suffer from a disease of the mind there is still an extremely high level of stigma for us. The mentally ill also have a harder time finding a spouse. Those suffering from mental illness also have a much more challenging time finding gainful employment. Many employers want nothing to do with someone who discloses or who they suspect has a mental illness. There is widespread discrimination and bigotry against the mentally ill. It is the last acceptable prejudice in our modern and “progressive” society, yet you rarely hear even a word about it.

    Overall, the mentally ill are more likely to act out violently than the general public. However, this association is not very strong. The overwhelming majority of people with diagnosed mental disorders do not engage in violence. Also, the manner in which mental illness contributes to violence when it does varies considerably and is often far from clear.

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/200011/are-the-mentally-ill-really-violent

    Sadly, as this paper attests, today in America our prisons are being used to warehouse the mentally ill. Conventional wisdom for most of modern history was that people suffering from mental disorders should be locked up in sanitoriums and mental hospitals (which often had appalling amounts of physical, emotional, and sexual abuse). Barbaric procedures like electroshock therapy and lobotomies (part of the brain is removed) were common. In the later part of the 20th-century conventional wisdom in psychiatry changed and many state mental hospitals were closed (including Mayview here in southwestern Pennsylvania where my mother and sister Vi spent time). The idea was to get the mentally ill living independently on their own or in a group home setting. This has pros and cons. Overall, I think it’s great that the mentally ill are able to live productive lives in freedom. But I think allowing those prone to violence to live free in society is a major mistake that has oftentimes tragic consequences and is responsible for the associations of violence with the mentally ill in the general public’s minds. However, I don’t think prisons are the answer for most of the mentally ill currently in prison. Only those who have committed truly violent and horrific acts should be kept in prison.

    Going back to how the Body of Christ treats the mentally ill, I think we need to equip seminaries with curricula targeted towards how the Church can best serve the needs of the mentally ill. Seminary professors need to be teaching this curriculum to future pastors, evangelists, and missionaries. At the level of the local church, I think the pastoral team has to take the lead from the head minister. He needs to instruct his staff to spend extra time welcoming those who disclose or who are suspected of suffering from mental illness. They need to be sensitive to their conditions and respectful. The staff should also help the mentally ill to get connected with friends in the church. The congregants can invite the mentally ill over for dinner, invite them to Bible study, make them truly feel a valued part of the church community. And parents should not discourage their daughters from dating or marrying a brother in Christ who suffers from mental illness.

    I think America could learn a lot by studying the solutions Western European countries have developed for dealing with mental illness. From talking to my dear brother in Christ Peter, who lives in Sweden (he suffers from schizophrenia as do I), they have apartment buildings with 24×7 in-house staff to assist the mentally ill who get the dignity and freedom of living on their own. Also, the economics must change drastically. Countries like Sweden give people who are disabled due to mental illness around $3,000 per month to live on. Whereas here in America, those on SSI, like my sister Vi, get less than $900, and those on Social Security disability, like me, get just over $1,000! Western Europe is far more generous than America when it comes to spending on mental health. And there is far less ignorance. If America spent a fraction of its defense budget on the mentally ill it would have a remarkable effect. Yet, due to apathy, widespread ignorance, and stigma among policymakers and politicians I don’t expect much to change. In my entire adult life, I can count on one hand the number of times I heard an American politician of any state talk about increasing funding for the mentally ill substantially. This country gives trillions of dollars in tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans, yet can’t spend more on those who are most in need and who are most vulnerable. It’s disgusting! When you talk about spending more on the mentally ill, or God forbid, a tax to help pay for it, you are quickly dismissed as a socialist by many Americans. How sad. How un-Christ-like! In the social pecking order we, the mentally ill, are the most disenfranchised. We are on the bottom! You hear much talk about racism in America and this problem is much more prevalent than actual racism and affects a much larger percentage of Americans (50% mentally ill compared to 12% blacks).

    We need to reach people when they are still young. We need comprehensive mental health education and support in all schools from K-12 and in colleges.

    By the way, mental illnesses are widespread in America. Nearly one in five U.S. adults live with a mental illness (52.9 million in 2020). Mental illnesses are among the most common health conditions in the United States.

    • More than 50% will be diagnosed with a mental illness or disorder at some point in their lifetime.
    • 1 in 5 Americans will experience a mental illness in a given year.
    • 1 in 5 children, either currently or at some point during their life, have had a seriously debilitating mental illness.
    • 1 in 25 Americans lives with a serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depression.

    By the way, the entertainment industry rarely produces content that is positive with respect to the mentally ill. I recently watched an excellent TV episode of the show Highway to Heaven (Season 3, Episode 19 – “Normal People“) centering on this topic. Jonathan and Mark’s assignment is at a transitional living facility (halfway house as they say in the show) where 8 people are being transitioned from mental hospitals to independence and reintegration into society. It was excellent how it portrayed the stigma and pain of those who suffer from mental illness, and the fear and rejection by those who were ignorant of mental illness. Eventually, some of the community sees that the mentally ill are just normal people like themselves. Highway to Heaven was a groundbreaking show. Michael Landon dealt with social issues that were rarely portrayed on TV. This episode aired on February 11, 1987, which was sadly over 35 years ago! We need to demand more quality entertainment focusing on educating and telling the stories of people who suffer from mental illness. You can watch this episode below.

  • Faith in Action

    This poem was inspired by my dearest sister Vi! Thanks!

    My thoughts are troubled and disjointed
    But this too was appointed

    I need not fear
    For God is near

    As close as my very heart
    He promised to not ever depart

    So amidst the mental chaos, I am calm
    God’s Word is a soothing balm

    Everything will be ok for me
    Because Christ set me free


  • Men left behind

    Men have fallen way behind women for college/university attendance and graduation rates. This has been a 40-year trend.

    Men are abandoning higher education in such numbers that they now trail female college students by record levels.

    At the close of the 2020-21 academic year, women made up 59.5% of college students, an all-time high, and men 40.5%, according to enrollment data from the National Student Clearinghouse, a nonprofit research group. U.S. colleges and universities had 1.5 million fewer students compared with five years ago, and men accounted for 71% of the decline.

    This education gap, which holds at both two- and four-year colleges, has been slowly widening for 40 years. The divergence increases at graduation: After six years of college, 65% of women in the U.S. who started a four-year university in 2012 received diplomas by 2018 compared with 59% of men during the same period, according to the U.S. Department of Education.

    In the next few years, two women will earn a college degree for every man, if the trend continues, said Douglas Shapiro, executive director of the research center at the National Student Clearinghouse.

    No reversal is in sight. Women increased their lead over men in college applications for the 2021-22 school year—3,805,978 to 2,815,810—by nearly a percentage point compared with the previous academic year, according to Common Application, a nonprofit that transmits applications to more than 900 schools. Women make up 49% of the college-age population in the U.S., according to the Census Bureau.

    “Men are falling behind remarkably fast,” said Thomas Mortenson, a senior scholar at the Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education, which aims to improve educational opportunities for low-income, first-generation and disabled college students.

    American colleges, which are embroiled in debates over racial and gender equality, and working on ways to reduce sexual assault and harassment of women on campus, have yet to reach a consensus on what might slow the retreat of men from higher education. Some schools are quietly trying programs to enroll more men, but there is scant campus support for spending resources to boost male attendance and retention.

    The college gender gap cuts across race, geography and economic background. For the most part, white men—once the predominant group on American campuses—no longer hold a statistical edge in enrollment rates, said Mr. Mortenson, of the Pell Institute. Enrollment rates for poor and working-class white men are lower than those of young Black, Latino and Asian men from the same economic backgrounds, according to an analysis of census data by the Pell Institute for the Journal.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/college-university-fall-higher-education-men-women-enrollment-admissions-back-to-school-11630948233#=

    There are now over 1 million more female college students than males, 59.5% of all college students, even though females are only 49% of the population. This is a direct result of a feminist culture that devalues men and supports females. All my life I’ve heard from educators, journalists, professors, and pundits how women are oppressed and need special affirmative action to make it. All the way that women were being favored, men were ignored! This is Satanic. God’s plan for mankind is for the man to work and the female to be a homemaker. There are valid exceptions to this rule, but it should hold true for most people.

    One of the saddest things about men being left behind academically is that no one seems to care. There is very little discussion of this disparity between women and men in the media, in academia, from politicians, K-12 educators, or from pastors. You won’t see widespread calls for affirmative action to help men as you saw with minorities or with women. Men will continue to fall behind. It’s a real tragedy. We live in a culture that hates biblical values for men. Patriarchy is attacked as being misogynist and sexist, racist and it’s declared by feminists as unworkable in modern society. We, as Christians, must stand up for biblical values. We must value men and their important role as husbands, fathers, and workers. We must demand that this achievement gap be addressed and solutions implemented.

  • A St. Patrick’s Day Poem

    Minard Castle, Dingle Peninsula, Kerry, Ireland

    On this day so full of mirth
    I think of Christianity in Ireland’s birth

    Brave Patrick forged the way
    Preaching the Gospel to the pagans, a bold new foray

    The Celtic cross stands strong
    With shamrock in bloom we sing this song

    Modernism and secularism – Satan’s wile
    Is attacking the faith in the Emerald Isle

    But God’s Word shall forever stand
    In this green and pleasant land

    Faithful parents are raising their children the right way
    To fear and love the Lord everyday

    Let the church bells ring and the uilleann pipes too
    Christ reigns forever, may this land He renew

    Alas, I think of Grammy, my Irish grandma
    She’s smiling in Heaven as we sing “Erin go bragh!”

  • 1980s Medley

    Here are 3 songs I was listening to this morning through Alexa on our Echo Dot smart speaker.

    First Song

    The first song is “Don’t You Forget About Me” by the Scottish rock band Simple Minds. It was released on February 20, 1985. The song was featured in the movie “The Breakfast Club.” It became a number 1 hit in the US in May 1985. “The Breakfast Club” was enormously successful and fueled the song’s popularity.

    Lyrics

    Hey, hey, hey, hey
    Ooh, woah

    Won’t you come see about me?
    I’ll be alone, dancing you know it, baby
    Tell me your troubles and doubts
    Giving me everything inside and out and
    Love’s strange so real in the dark
    Think of the tender things that we were working on
    Slow change may pull us apart
    When the light gets into your heart, baby

    Don’t you forget about me
    Don’t don’t don’t don’t
    Don’t you forget about me

    Will you stand above me
    Look my way, never love me
    Rain keeps falling, rain keeps falling
    Down, down, down
    Will you recognise me
    Call my name or walk on by
    Rain keeps falling, rain keeps falling
    Down, down, down, down

    Hey, hey, hey, hey
    Ooh, woah

    Don’t you try to pretend
    It’s my feeling we’ll win in the end
    I won’t harm you or touch your defenses
    Vanity, insecurity ah

    Don’t you forget about me
    I’ll be alone, dancing you know it baby
    Going to take you apart
    I’ll put us back together at heart, baby

    Don’t you forget about me
    Don’t don’t don’t don’t
    Don’t you forget about me

    As you walk on by
    Will you call my name?
    As you walk on by
    Will you call my name?
    When you walk away
    Oh will you walk away?
    Will you walk on by?
    Come on, call my name
    Will you call my name?

    I say:
    La la la…

    When you walk on by
    And you call my name…

    Second Song

    The second song is “Out of Touch” by Hall & Oates. They dominated the 1980s with one hit after another. It was released on October 4, 1984. The song was a number 1 hit on the charts in the US. I remember when this song came out. I was 9 years old. I didn’t understand all the lyrics then, but I loved the song then and love it even more now as an adult. By the way, many younger gamers know this song because it was featured in the video game Grand Theft Auto: Vice City (2002).

    In a 1985 interview with the New York City Tribune, John Oates, who came up with the original idea for the song and wrote the chorus, explained the importance of the line in the song, “We’re soul alone and soul really matters to me”:

    “‘Don’t lose your soul’ is one of our central themes. Soul matters. Roots matter. They’re the source of your power, your core, the energy that sets you apart from the molecules in the wallpaper.”

    Lyrics

    Shake it up is all that we know
    Using the bodies up as we go
    I’m waking up to fantasy
    The shades all around
    Aren’t the colors we used to see
    Broken ice still melts in the sun
    And times that are broken
    Can often be one again
    We’re soul alone
    And soul really matters to me
    Take a look around

    You’re out of touch
    I’m out of time (time)
    But I’m out of my head
    When you’re not around
    You’re out of touch
    I’m out of time (time)
    But I’m out of my head
    When you’re not around
    Oh, oh-oh, oh
    Oh, oh-oh, oh

    Reaching out for something to hold
    Looking for a love
    Where the climate is cold
    Manic moves and drowsy dreams
    Or living in the middle
    Between the two extremes
    Smoking guns hot to the touch
    Would cool down
    If we didn’t use them so much
    We’re soul alone
    And soul really matters to me
    Too much

    You’re out of touch
    I’m out of time (time)
    But I’m out of my head
    When you’re not around
    You’re out of touch
    I’m out of time (time)
    But I’m out of my head
    When you’re not around
    Oh, oh-oh, oh
    Oh, oh-oh, oh…

    (Out of touch)
    Out of touch

    You’re out of touch
    I’m out of time (time)
    But I’m out of my head
    When you’re not around
    You’re out of touch
    I’m out of time (time)
    But I’m out of my head
    When you’re not around..

    Third Song

    The third and final song in my medley is “Your Love” by the English rock band The Outfield. It was released on February 14, 1986. It’s a New Wave, power pop and pop rock song.

    Josie’s on a vacation far away
    Come around and talk it over
    So many things that I want to say
    You know I like my girls a little bit older
    I just wanna use your love tonight
    I don’t wanna lose your love tonight

    I ain’t got many friends left to talk to
    No one’s around when I’m in trouble
    You know I’d do anything for you
    Stay the night but keep it undercover
    I just wanna use your love tonight, whoa
    I don’t wanna lose your love tonight

    Try to stop my hands from shakin’
    Somethin’ in my mind’s not makin’ sense
    It’s been awhile since we were all alone
    I can’t hide the way I’m feelin’

    As you leave me, please, would you close the door?
    And don’t forget what I told you
    Just ’cause you’re right, that don’t mean I’m wrong
    Another shoulder to cry upon
    I just wanna use your love tonight, yeah
    I don’t wanna lose your love tonight
    Yeah, I just wanna use your love tonight
    I don’t wanna lose your love tonight
    I just wanna use your love tonight
    I don’t wanna lose your love tonight

    (Lose your love)
    (Lose your love)
    Tonight (Lose your love)
    I don’t wanna lose (Lose your love tonight)
    I don’t wanna, I don’t wanna, I don’t wanna (Lose your love tonight)
    No, no (Lose your love tonight)
    (Lose your love tonight)
    No, no (I don’t wanna lose your love tonight)
    (Lose your love tonight)

  • Justification: by works or by faith?

    Justification by faith alone (Sola Fide) is the sine qua non (the essential thing without which it cannot be) of the Protestant Reformation. It is this doctrine upon which the Reformation stands or falls. However, there is sharp disagreement with the Roman Catholic church on this topic. What does the Bible say? Who is more faithful to Scripture on this matter, the Reformers or Rome?

    According to Scripture, justification (how a sinner is made in right standing before God) is a free, unmerited gift. It is not earned. Believers are justified by God “as a gift by His grace” (Romans 3:24). If our justification is done by God by grace then “it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise, grace is no longer grace” (Romans 11:6). As we can see, God doesn’t ask sinners to work for justification, but rather, to believe. God justifies “the one who has faith in Jesus” (Romans 3:26).

    However, the Roman Catholic church teaches that justification by faith without works is heresy:

    If anyone says that the faith which justifies is nothing else but trust in the divine mercy, which pardons sins because of Christ’ or that it is that trust alone by which we are justified: let him be anathema.

    Council of Trent

    An anathema means one is damned and it outside the Body of Christ.

    Rome says faith alone is insufficient grounds for justification [CCC 1815-1816]:

    If anyone says that the sinner is justified by faith alone, meaning thereby that no other cooperation is required for him to obtain the grace of justification, and that in no sense it is necessary for him to make preparation and be disposed by a movement of his own will: let him be anathema.

    Council of Trent

    Rome is keenly aware that the Apostle Paul explicitly lists faith as the only necessary response for justification (Romans 3:26, 3:28; 4:3; 5:1). It recognizes that its condemnation of justification by faith as a gift requires some further explanation:

    When the Apostle says that a person is justified by faith and as a gift, those words are to be understood in the sense which the perennial consent of the catholic church has maintained and expressed, namely, that we are said to be justified by faith because faith is the first stage of human salvation, the foundation and root of all justification, without which it is impossible to please God and come to the fellowship of His children.

    Council of Trent

    It should be noted that nowhere in the apostle Paul’s writings, nor anywhere else in the New Testament, does it say that faith is merely the “first stage” leading to ultimate justification. When Rome calls the first stage of salvation faith, and good works the second stage, it ignores the fact that the Scriptures explicitly and emphatically say that good works have no role in justification. This is a huge problem of textual interpretation. It is clear that concerning the justification of a believer Rome engages in eisegesis of the related texts and imposes her own manmade interpretation upon the Scriptures. This is wrongly handling the Word of God.

    But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness

    Romans 4:5

    So, as we have seen, according to the Scriptures, the sole requirement for justification is faith which Rome denies.

    Now let’s look at a Scripture that Rome uses to refute the Protestant doctrine of justification by faith alone:

    You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only.

    James 2:24

    At first sight, this verse might seem to support Rome’s claim that faith and works must precede justification in adult believers. [CCC 161-162, 1248, 1815]. However, as we shall see, when this verse is interpreted in its proper context, Rome’s claim is without support.

    James was not writing to a group of unbelievers or catechumens. His audience was people already professing to be Christians. He knew that some of them were living in wanton sin and that their actions didn’t match up with the faith they espoused. He reminds them that living and mature faith will be accompanied by good works, which God has prepared for us. James hoped that these hypocrites would re-evaluate how they are living, and would start living in a moral way, consistent with the faith they claim.

    Let’s step back and look at the larger context of James 2:24. It is a vital component of a 13 verse long discussion viz. James 2:14-26. The passage opens with 2 questions James wants his readers to consider.

    What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him?

    James 2:14

    In other words, if a person claims to have faith, but you don’t see good works evident in his life, is that person truly saved? Do they have genuine faith?

    In the subsequent verses, James shows that true faith will be accompanied by good works. A faith that is only all words, and no actions, is “dead” (James 2:17) and “useless” (James 2:20). James uses Abraham as an example of a person who had genuine faith accompanied by good works. This brings us to the second question James wanted us to consider:

    Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered Isaac his son on the altar?

    James 2:21

    James’ answer to the question is yes. In Genesis 22 Abraham, being obedient to God, went to sacrifice his beloved son Isaac on the altar. His actions demonstrated Abraham to be a righteous man of real and active faith. It is in this context that James declares “You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only” (James 2:24).

    A very important point to note here is that this verse did not describe how Abraham was justified by God. We see in Genesis 15 that when God promised Abraham his descendants would be as numerous as the stars in heaven, Abraham believed in God.

    And he believed in the Lord, and He accounted it to him for righteousness.

    Genesis 15:6

    It’s clear from Scripture that Abraham was justified before God before he demonstrated good works (sacrificing Isaac). The ground of God’s justification of Abraham was his belief. Responding to Abraham’s faith, the Lord credited righteousness to Abraham’s account. God declared him to be righteous simply because he believed, and for no other reason. The apostle Paul confirms this point:

    For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.”

    Romans 4:2,3

    Despite Rome’s claims, James 2:14-26 does not establish works righteousness, nor does it describe how to prepare oneself for baptismal regeneration (justification), which is itself another fallacious doctrine. The subject of these verses is the type of faith that saves, of living faith as opposed to dead faith (James 2:17). It’s about a faith demonstrated by good works. He challenges us “Show me your faith.” just as Abraham did (James 2:18).

    In summation, we see that works play no role whatsoever in our justification (a juridical act), but they do play a role in our sanctification. Sadly, Rome conflates justification with sanctification. Scripture makes it clear that they are two distinct processes.

  • 1980s British Bands + Elvis

    Always Something There to Remind Me

    Here are two 1980s songs, by two different British bands that I really like.

    The first is “Always Something There to Remind Me” by Naked Eyes. This less well-known New Wave song was a great example of synth-pop. I should point out that this song makes good use of church bells.

    Lyrics

    I walk along the city streets you used to walk along with me
    And every step I take reminds me of just how
    We used to be

    Well, how can I forget you girl
    When there is always something there to remind me?
    Always something there to remind me

    As shadows fall, I pass a small cafe where we would dance at night
    And I can’t help recalling
    How it felt to kiss and hold you tight

    Well, how can I forget you girl
    When there is always something there to remind me?
    Always something there to remind me

    I was born to love her
    And I will never be free
    You’ll always be a part of me
    Oh whoa whoa whoa

    If you should find you miss the sweet and tender love we used to share
    Just come back to the places where we used to go
    And I’ll be there

    Well, how can I forget you girl
    When there is always something there to remind me?
    Always something there to remind me

    I was born to love her
    And I will never be free
    You’ll always be a part of me

    ‘Cause there is always something there to remind me
    Always something there to remind me

    Always something there to remind me
    Always something there to remind me
    Always something there to remind me
    Always something there to remind me

    Always something there to remind me
    Always something there to remind me
    Always something there to remind me

    Always On My Mind

    The second song is “Always On My Mind” released on November 30, 1987, by the British group Pet Shop Boys. This is another New Wave song featuring synth-pop. Their song is very upbeat and has a faster tempo than the Elvis Presley cover of this song. I think, although I really enjoy the Pet Shop Boys’ rendition, I prefer the Presley which has a richer tone and expresses more feeling.

    Lyrics

    Maybe I didn’t treat you quite as good as I should
    Maybe I didn’t love you quite as often as I could
    Little things I should’ve said and done, I never took the time
    You were always on my mind
    You were always on my mind

    Maybe I didn’t hold you all those lonely, lonely times
    And I guess I never told you, I’m so happy that you’re mine
    If I made you feel second best, I’m so sorry, I was blind
    You were always on my mind
    You were always on my mind

    Tell me, tell me that your sweet love hasn’t died
    Give me one more chance to keep you satisfied
    Satisfied

    Little things I should’ve said and done, I never took the time
    You were always on my mind
    You were always on my mind

    Tell me, tell me that your sweet love hasn’t died
    Give me one more chance to keep you satisfied

    You were always on my mind
    You were always on my mind
    You were always on my mind
    You were always on my mind
    You were always on my mind
    You were always on my mind

    Maybe I didn’t treat you quite as good as I should
    Maybe I didn’t love you quite as often as I could
    Maybe I didn’t hold you all those lonely, lonely times
    And I guess I never told you, I’m so happy that you’re mine

    (Maybe I didn’t love you…)

    Elvis

    Elvis Presley recorded the song on March 29, 1972, a few weeks after his separation, in February, from his beloved wife Priscilla whom Elvis would later say was the only true love of his life. You can hear the pain and longing in Presley’s rendition of this song. It’s a brilliant performance.

  • Communist takeover of America

    The unfairly maligned US Senator Joseph R. McCarthy was prescient in his vision of communist infiltration and eventual takeover of America in the early 1950s. He saw the problem primarily in the entertainment industry, the state department, and even the army (see more on this below), but the real seeds of destruction, in my view, lay in academia.

    In the 1950s, Senator Joseph McCarthy waged war on those he thought were loyalists to the communist party and had infiltrated American politics and its way of life. World War II had happened only a few years earlier, there was growing fear about the danger of having this ideology in America and it was at the forefront of the minds of Americans.

    The conflict, between fascist Germany and communist Russia, two ideological extremes, left people with a palpable sense of the intent and viciousness of these two economic systems that depended on a totalitarian regime as their master.

    Now we live in a time where the American Communist Party has a website and openly advertises its point of view. So much so they have become the mainstream mantra. Almost everything we see in the headlines today can be traced back to the website of the American Communist Party. The so-called social justice movement, Black Lives Matter (BLM) – which was founded by two self-described Marxists, racial tensions between blacks and whites being exacerbated and fueled by sensationalist rhetoric, mainstream media’s attention, and taking isolated incidents of police brutality as indicative of widespread systemic racism. This is pure communism! Marx is clear that the traditional institutions have to be subverted to make way for the proletariat and the worker’s revolution.

    The echoing of Social Justice rings of the past revolutions of the Chinese and Russian communist takeovers. The infiltration of it in our schools, media, and military are the building blocks for its confiscation of not only our private property and private enterprise but the complete seizure of our freedoms.

    With the blood of those that sacrificed now nothing but a dry memory and so cradled in the luxury of liberty, we find our social studies classes not only not accurately portraying the evil that came from these theories but painting them in a glamourous and humanitarian light. Further the assertion by communists/socialists that capitalism is itself problematic, selfish, unjust, greedy, and racist has been a key plank in the American Communist party’s plans. This effort creates division and confusion, pinning Americans against each other while the communist is cherry-picking their conquest around the globe while the referee of civil society is distracted.

    So was Senator Joseph McCarthy correct? Should we not have allowed such ideas to flourish and take root? Quoting Karl Marx. “I will hang the capitalist with the rope he sold me.” Our very freedoms and liberties and the American way of life is under attack. Most public school teachers are communists/socialists and have been slowly but methodically brainwashing children for the past 70 years! They teach hatred for the American way of life, they deride America as a racist and bigoted country, as an aggressive imperialist power, they decry capitalism, they teach the evolution of the species and scientific (atheistic) materialism, they teach revisionist history which makes America the aggressor or enemy in almost every phase of our history. Further, the first wave of communist infiltration in America occurred in academia, in our colleges and universities. Once these professors were radicalized they brainwashed generations of American college students to despise the Amerian way of life, to abhor religion (specifically the Christian faith), to hate free-market capitalism as evil, to label their parents and relatives as racist hateful bigots, to teach them that there is nothing wrong with homosexuality or transgenderism, to stoke and support the labor movement as a means of class warfare.

    This is the Communist Party USA’s website.

    Recent evidence has vindicated McCarthy! See below.

    Although Joseph McCarthy was one of the most demonized American politicians of the last century, new information — including half-century-old FBI recordings of Soviet embassy conversations — are showing that McCarthy was right in nearly all his accusations.   “With Joe McCarthy it was the losers who’ve written the history which condemns him,” said Dan Flynn, director of <http://www.academia.org Accuracy in Academia’s recent national conference on McCarthy, broadcast by C-SPAN.   Using new information obtained from studies of old Soviet files in Moscow and now the famous Vanona Intercepts — FBI recordings of Soviet embassy communications between 1944-48 — the record is showing that McCarthy was essentially right. He had many weaknesses, but almost every case he charged has now been proven correct. Whether it was stealing atomic secrets or influencing U.S. foreign policy, communist victories in the 1940s were fed by an incredibly vast spy and influence network.   The conference, a gathering of old McCarthyites and younger scholars, commemorated the senator’s first speech, in Wheeling, West Virginia 50 years ago, when he first held up a list of names of employees of the State Department whom, he said, were major security risks. McCarthy questioned how, in six short years after America’s winning of World War II, the communist world was triumphant and had expanded to include 800 million people.   Of the lists, a key one consisted of 108 names from a House Appropriations Committee report, of persons declared as “security risks” in the State Department — the Lee List. The House committee chairman had complained that State wasn’t bothering to do anything about the suspects. Details of the list and its accusations were presented at the conference.   Speakers detailed many of the cover-ups used to smear McCarthy. Veteran journalist and teacher Stan Evans, director of National Journalism Center, told of the Tydings Committee, which had investigated McCarthy’s charges of communists in government. Its report had exonerated everybody. Among the accused it stated categorically that there was no evidence against Owen Lattimore, a man McCarthy said was a major figure in the communist conspiracy. Lattimore had been Roosevelt’s key advisor on China policy. Yet Evans showed evidence from 5,000 pages of FBI files on him — files released only a few years ago to the public, although the White House had access to them.   However, evidence before the committee showed that Lattimore had supported Soviet policy at every turn, even declaring that the Stalin purge trials in Russia, “sound like democracy to me.” With then-Vice President Henry Wallace in Russia, Lattimore compared concentration camps to the Tennessee Valley Authority, and later urged Washington to abandon China to communism and to withdraw from Japan and Korea. FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover, who had fed information to McCarthy, broke with him afterwards, fearing McCarthy would prejudice FBI sources of information for its criminal prosecutions.   Although most of McCarthy’s cases involved actual spies and “security risks,” the really important issue was that of communist influence over American foreign policy, argued Evans. Harry Hopkins, Roosevelt’s closest advisor who lived in the White House, had regular contacts with Soviet intelligence. He helped bring about the disastrous Yalta and Pottsdam agreements. The Morganthau Plan, to prevent German reconstruction and starve the Germans to make them desperate enough to go communist, was the product of Laughlin Currie and Harry Dexter White at the Treasury Department. The abandonment of Chiang Kai-shek by denying military support was the product of “China Hands” led by John Stewart Service, John Patton Davies, and Lattimore. Evans described other major spy networks — in England, the Burgess Maclean group which infiltrated Washington as well as London.   Reed Irvine, chairman of Accuracy in Media, told how he himself had been a leftist in his early career. He had been against McCarthy, but McCarthy’s speeches had made him think and start to read “evidence that I had avoided.” He described how all during his military career as a Marine officer and later in Japan with the U.S. occupation he had never hidden his leftist views and later had even been offered a job at the CIA. Irvine argued that real communists were only in the hundreds, but that thousands of leftists, such as he, all feared McCarthy and had wanted him discredited.   Pulling all the latest evidence together was luncheon speaker Professor Arthur Herman. His new book, “Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America’s Most Hated Senator,” and featured in the Sunday New York Times Magazine, shows the vindication of most of McCarthy’s charges. Herman, who is also coordinator of the Smithsonian’s Western Heritage Program, said that the accuracy of McCarthy’s charges “was no longer a matter of debate,” that they are “now accepted as fact.” However, the term “McCarthyism” still remains in the language.   Asked whether McCarthy had understood all the forces arrayed against him, Herman said no, that McCarthy hadn’t realized he’d be fighting against much of the Washington establishment. President Truman was fearful that exposures would reflect on key Democrat officials, he said, and big media and the academic world were very leftist, a heritage of the Depression and World War II. High government officials also feared investigations of their past appointments and associations with people who turned out to be communists or sympathizers.   That was the reason McCarthy was so demonized, he said.   Joe McCarthy had been a Marine air gunner, an amateur boxer, a county judge and towards his end, under constant attack, he began to drink heavily. Herman said he certainly was over his head and his fall came about after sweeping attacks on General Marshall and the Army. Senator Taft and other key supporters began to draw away from him.   If Robert Kennedy, his competent and well-connected co-counsel, had stayed on, McCarthy might have behaved more carefully, said Herman. An argument with other co-counsel Roy Cohn left Cohn in charge, but Cohn and staffer David Schine were disastrous for McCarthy. Still, McCarthy’s original charges helped bring about Eisenhower’s electoral victory and the defeat of the Democrats and key leftist Democratic senators such as Tydings of Maryland. Four years after his original charges, Joe McCarthy was censured by the Senate and died shortly thereafter.   There is more evidence to come. Herb Rome Stein, another speaker, who started out with the old House Un-American Activities Committee, is writing a book about the Vanona FBI intercepts and their links to other evidence from his comprehensive study in Russia of Soviet archives, made available to Westerners since the fall of communism. His book, The Vanona Secrets, will be released by Regnery Gateway this fall. Audiotapes of the “Accuracy in Academia” conference are available online.

    https://rense.com/politics6/mc.htm

    And here is more evidence.

    At the recent conference on “Rethinking McCarthy,” veteran journalist M. Stanton Evans disputed a number of myths about the Senator that have been accepted by leading historians and media figures. Evans, the director of the National Journalism Center who is writing his own book on Senator Joseph McCarthy, said one of the most notorious myths is that the Wisconsin Senator never named any names of suspected communists in government. Holding up a file of material, Evans said, “Here are the names. Right here. Anybody who wants to can look at them.” He produced a letter that McCarthy sent to Senator Millard Tydings in 1950 in which he listed the names.

    The original list, which included numbers of cases and not names, was obtained by McCarthy after it was put together by congressional staffers. It was drawn from the files of the State Department itself. But McCarthy provided the cases to Tydings with the names attached. Critics have said over the years that the list was either outdated, blown out of proportion, that the individuals named were cleared by congressional committees, or that they were just mildly leftist. But none of that was true. Evans quoted from some of them: “…he furnished material to a known Soviet espionage agent…” and “…He is a known Communist Party member.”

    Evans said the biggest piece of disinformation was that these cases had been cleared by congressional hearings. This was false. The chairman of one committee said the information showed “a large number of communists on the rolls of the State Department.” He added, “It makes me wonder if there is any representation of the United States in the State Department.”

    McCarthy also had access to information about Amerasia, a pro-Communist magazine, and State Department diplomat John Stewart Service, who was arrested for passing classified information to its editor. In a major speech, McCarthy called the Justice Department failure to prosecute the case a massive cover-up. “We now know that he was 100 percent correct,” Evans said of McCarthy?s charges. The FBI wiretapped the meeting where the cover-up was planned and the case was fixed to get Service off. Playing a role in the cover-up was Soviet agent Laughlin Currie in the White House. He was a key adviser to President Franklin Roosevelt.

    Another McCarthy target, Owen Lattimore of the Institute for Pacific Relations, was supposedly investigated by the Tydings Committee, which found nothing incriminating in his FBI files. But Evans read from that file, page one, which said back in 1941 that Lattimore was a communist who should be detained in the event of a national emergency.

    All of this mattered for two reasons. One, some of these people engaged in espionage for the Soviet Union. Two, they manipulated U.S. foreign policy to the benefit of the communists. For example, they maneuvered to cut off aid to the Chinese nationalists in order to betray China to the communists. This betrayal left mainland China in the hands of the Communists and the nationalists fled to the island of Taiwan. More than 50 years later, the betrayal continues under the Clinton Administration. But Senator Joe McCarthy tried to prevent it.

    https://www.aim.org/media-monitor/joe-mccarthy-was-right/

    So McCarthy was correct in his assertion that American foreign policy, as well as domestic policies, were being subverted and directed by Communist infiltraitors. Here is a foreboding speech McCarthy delivered.

    You will not learn this in your public schools. You will not learn this in your private schools with leftist leanings. Simply put, the truth about leftism in America is available, but you yourself must seek it. Much of what you are about to read may seem revisionist, even sensationalist, but it is all true. Despite academia and the media’s assertion that Joseph McCarthy was a paranoid extremist, the truth is that there were at least several hundred active Soviet agents within the federal government, many of which were as high up as the State department and even served as advisors to FDR. In addition, many of these communists were instrumental in the establishment of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and even the United Nations.

    McCarthy was right. Communists had infiltrated the American government, but the communists who now dominate American education do not want you to know this.

    Much of this would not be possible were it not for the role the media, popular culture, and labor unions played in instilling sympathy for communism into the minds of the American people. From Isadora Duncan, Lincoln Steffens, John Dewey, Jane Addams, to a vast conglomerate of labor unions, Communist Sympathizers were everywhere. But perhaps the most egregious story was of one of the most trusted newspapers of the time, The New York Times, intentionally covering up Stalin’s genocide against the Ukrainians. Walter Duranty was the Moscow Bureau Chief from 1922 to 1936 for the New York Times. He was assigned with the task of reporting on the inner workings of the Soviet Union. Duranty went on to receive a Pulitzer Prize for his reporting.

    But of course, his reporting was not honest. Despite the clear evidence, Duranty reported “no famine or actual starvation nor is there likely to be” in the Soviet Union in November of 1932. At this point, millions had been deliberately starved in Ukraine by Stalin. This reporting only continued for the remaining four years Duranty spent in the Soviet Union. Years later, there were calls to revoke Duranty’s Pulitzer Prize. Those calls were, of course, ignored. Perhaps Duranty knew that no one would ever consider socialism as an option were the atrocious acts of the communists exposed.

    Things get worse when one considers the fact that the communists had successfully become a part of the US Government. This will be the focus of the article from here on out. With the reveal of these cases, one could see the immense power of the war McCarthy waged to keep communists and agents of the Soviet Union out of the US Government. Much of the information provided here is readily accessible through the 1995 declassified Venona Project files.

    The Venona files are Soviet messages US intelligence intercepted throughout the 1940s. As of now, it is confirmed that at least 350 Americans played an active role in Soviet espionage. This is an extremely conservative estimate since only about one in ten messages have been decoded. With this in mind, we could assume that more names are listed in the still encrypted messages. In addition, no one knows how many messages the US government failed to intercept. Ultimately, no one knows how many American communist sympathizers actively worked with the Soviet Union to bring about Communism in the US, but we can be certain that at least 350 were. But here are the stories of a few of the communists who managed to infiltrate the US Federal Government and impose policies that brought America closer to Communism.

    Harry Dexter White, Assistant Secretary of Treasury, was a Soviet agent who used the code name “Jurist.” Not only was White the Assistant Secretary of Treasury, but he was instrumental in founding the World Bank, and was the first director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). White brought the Soviets one step closer to the establishment of worldwide communism through globalist central planning.

    Alger Hiss, an attendant of the Yalta Convention and legal assistant to the Nye Committee, was also convicted of perjury in connection to acts of espionage on behalf of the Soviet Union. The Nye Committee was another organization that was fully dedicated to the establishment of international governing organizations upon the end of WWII. Hiss ultimately played an instrumental role in the establishment of entities such as the UN.

    Laurence Duggan, code-named “Frank” and “19,” was in charge of US relations with South America during WWII and was the president of the Institute for International Education. Duggan was a Soviet spy from the 30s until his death. The information that he gave to the Soviets included classified battle strategies of the US Military.

    Lauchlin Currie was an economic advisor to FDR. In this position, Currie devised plans to strengthen the Federal Reserve through 100% reserve banking. Currie also played a major role in the establishment of several New Deal programs. Currie was always capable of whispering into FDR’s ear when Stalin felt America wasn’t becoming communist at a fast enough pace.

    These four stories only scratch the surface of the immense effect the Soviets had on American policy through espionage. When someone claims that McCarthy was a crazy conspiracy theorist, they are further from the truth than McCarthy was. One could claim that McCarthy’s attack on Hollywood was too far, which would be debatable if only McCarthy had attacked Hollywood. Ultimately, Senator McCarthy was only concerned with communists that were working within the US government. The House of Representatives and the House Un-American Activities Committee, however, were concerned with everyday citizens.

    The truth of the matter is that the communists did infiltrate the US government. Communism or socialism isn’t cool or good. Do not believe the lies that the communists were not actively attempting to overthrow capitalism and take over the US government to eliminate private property rights and other freedoms. All this information and more can be found with a simple Google Search. I encourage you to do your own research rather than believe your public school teachers and university professors!

    This so-called Red Scare of McCarthyism as some have named it is supposed to be about the paranoia and lust for power of one man harming innocent lives. This is a flawed narrative. McCarthy was a true patriot who deeply loved America. He saw, before many Americans did, the dangers of socialism/communism.

    McCarthy’s downfall, sadly, l came when he accused the US Army of harboring communists.

    But, as we have seen, McCarthy was a brave patriot who loved America and saw the nefarious and evil plans of global communism. He saw what would happen to America were we to allow communists and socialists to take over our schools, our media, our businesses, etc. He got some things wrong, but overall he was amazingly accurate in his assertions. One has to only look at the current Democrat party in America which officially espouses so-called “democrat socialism” which is nothing more than communism/socialism in a fancy new dress to distract people from their true aims! Communists in Cambodia, Vietnam, China, and the former Soviet Union murdered tens of millions of people. Even now communist China is poised to overtake America as the world’s foremost superpower in terms of the economy and military. This will prove to be disastrous. The Chinese Communist Party has persecuted millions of Chinese Christians with no end in sight.

    Sadly America no longer stands for Christianity, freedom, and civil liberties. It stands for degeneracy such as abortion on demand, no-fault divorce, transgenderism, homosexuality, socialist and communist policies, a depraved entertainment industry, a socialist secular mainstream media, religious pluralism, secular humanism, rampant materialism, unrestrained consumerism, etc. Sadly America has exported this garbage across the world. Europe is even worse and more advanced in its embrace of socialism/communism than America is.