-
My Broken Mind

I am crazy and barking mad
I’m quite insane
This is my sad refrainAt the turn of the millennium
‘Twas a score and three
Since I lost my sanityNow my days are troubled
Filled with pain and woe
We truly reap what we sowMy thoughts are speeding past
It’s a superluminal race
I can’t keep up the paceDelusions and hallucinations
Rule the day
I’m left with feeling dismayWhat’s it like
To be in a psychotic state
It ain’t greatMy mind is not well
Thoughts are disjointed and broken
Am I forsakenI’ll take my meds
See my psychiatrist and pray
And dream of a better daySometimes I get
A dissociative event
At least it’s not permanentI zone out
And lose all touch with reality
It’s very scaryMy depression makes me lie
In bed like a beached whale
Here ends my sad taleby Zachary Uram
(c) 2023 -
Thoughts on a Sunny Day
Woe is me
From happiness I doth flee
Time races past
I’m a ship without a mast
The days are dark and filled with pain
Will I ever be sane
Days turn into years
Who can erase my fears
I cling to hope and pray
Of a future happy day
For now I’ll bide my time
And dream of green hills I may climb
With no strength or energy
I’m a prisoner of my own body
I’ll retreat into my mind
What wonders I will find
Traveling the universe faster than light
I’ll return in a fortnight
If you care pray for me
Of a day when I’m happy and fancy free
By Zachary Uram
(C) 2023
-
Compromised Care

There has been, sadly, a disturbing trend of more medical doctors and psychiatrists being replaced by nurse practitioners (NPs) or physician assistants (PAs).
Administrators and doctors who own a private practice where they employ other doctors love it because it’s a way for them to reduce operating costs and increase profits.
I posit that the quality of care is compromised with respect to the patients and consumers.
There is simply no way that a nurse who takes extra classes and goes through some additional training is in any way equivalent in expertise or understanding to a trained medical doctor who has studied medicine for 7 years plus 3-4 years of residency. That lack of knowledge and lack of experience are critical factors.
On a personal level, I can relate that I’ve seen this compromised care play out. The place I go to for mental health treatment was 90% psychiatrists when I started going there 20 years ago. Today it is just 10% pscychiatrists. I have an extremely complex case. I have 4 severe mental illnesses, and I take 5 psychiatric drugs which have over 8 potential contra indications (bad ways the medications interact). There is simply no way a nurse practitioner is qualified to deal with my case, yet that’s the reality I’m in. I’ve noticed psychiatric care with a nurse practitioner become mainly maintaining current medication levels and a general assessment that one is not suicidal or homicidal (again they lack the expertise to gauge this as well as a psychiatrist). I used to spend 20-30 minutes discussing my psychiatric symptoms when I was seeing a psychiatrist there, such as: lethargy, lack of motivation, irregular sleep, feeling sad and crying a lot, taking no pleasure out of daily activities, hearing constant inner voices which bother me 24×7, intense visual hallucinations as well as both visual and audio at the same time, pressure/tactile hallucinations, deep seated delusions, paranoia, etc. All of that is now gone. The nurse practitioner is beyond her depth and unable to offer me high quality psychiatric care. We the consumers have complained about this problem for years, yet things are only getting worse.
I realize we have a shortage of doctors, as our aging population expands. New data released in April 2018 by the Association of American Medical Colleges notes that the shortage could climb as high as 120,000 doctors by 2030. But compromising patient/consumer care with nurse practitioners and physician assistants is not the solution.
Apologists argue that NPs and PAs allow for greater efficiency in a doctor’s office and allows more patients to be seen. The bottom line here is that these are financial considerations, not considerations that impact the improved quality of care.
Here is an article about a good book, written by 2 MDs, that highlights the issues in utilizing PAs and NPs and how this results in compromised care for their patients.
Physician authors explore what rise of NPs, PAs means for patients
Jul 21, 2022
As Alexus Ochoa-Dockins, a 19-year-old college athlete, was being rushed to the hospital, the responding paramedic contacted the emergency department to alert them that a patient with a suspected pulmonary embolism would be arriving shortly.
The family nurse practitioner (NP) who would see Alexus in the ED ordered an array of tests, including a chest CT scan that would have confirmed the paramedic’s suspicions. But the scan was postponed after Alexus fainted and a urinalysis showed “presumptive positive detection” for methamphetamine even though the test was negative for amphetamine.
Ten hours later, the CT scan was performed and was misread by the NP as a crushed sternum. While the diagnosis was wrong, it led to Alexus being transferred to a larger hospital where a physician correctly diagnosed her pulmonary embolism and began treatment. But it was too late, and she died two hours later.

Rebekah Bernard, MD
Rebekah Bernard, MD, uses Ochoa-Dockins’ story as a thread that ties together the issues she reports on in Patients at Risk: The Rise of the Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant in Healthcare, the book she co-wrote with Niran Al-Agba, MD, a pediatrician in Silverdale, Washington. Their book details how care from nonphysicians is dangerously being promoted as “just as good” as that provided by doctors—despite the huge differences in education and training requirements.
“The more we dug through the case, the more we realized that everything that we were talking about of concern, seemed to happen in her case—just so many perfect examples of just so many things going wrong,” Dr. Bernard said in an interview last year with the AMA.
“The sad thing is that this is not an isolated incident, it’s just an incident in which everything kind of came together to create this horrific outcome,” she added.
Who’s behind the white coat?
The book by Drs. Bernard and Al-Agba delves into how many patients don’t know that—despite their white coat—the person in the exam room with them is not a physician.
“Unfortunately, most Americans have remained dangerously unaware of this revolution in health care,” the book says. And, “if patients do wonder about being treated by a non-physician, they are reassured that their nurse practitioner or physician assistant is ‘just as good’ as a doctor, an idea reinforced by multimillion-dollar direct-to-patient advertising campaigns.”
An Oklahoma jury awarded Alexus’ estate $6.19 million, and their attorney said that there was hope that the verdict would lead to changes to ensure that “appropriately qualified medical providers” were on hand at all the state’s hospitals.
“If only this were the case,” Dr. Bernard wrote.
It’s the third book written by Dr. Bernard, whose parents were both registered nurses. Her solo practice, Gulf Coast Direct Primary Care, is in Fort Myers, Florida, where she also serves as president of the Collier County Medical Society and president of the grassroots advocacy group Physicians for Patient Protection.
Find out why physician-led care teams are key to battling the doctor shortage.
It’s about protecting patients
Dr. Bernard said her passion for the scope-of-practice issue is “about making sure that patients have the right quality of care and making sure that we’re going to have the care for ourselves because, ultimately, we’re all going to be patients someday.”
Dr. Bernard is a member of the Florida Medical Association and the AMA, and research from the AMA is cited throughout her book.
She also cited a 2019 study, “Potential Crisis in Nurse Practitioner Preparation in the United States,” published in the peer-reviewed journal Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice.
That study analyzes the American Association of Colleges of Nursing’s list of accredited doctorate of nursing practice (DNP) programs. Of the 533 DNP programs established between 2005 and 2018, researchers found, only 15% were clinical in nature, while the others focused on leadership and administration topics.
“That means 85% don’t give them any additional clinical training, yet now they have doctor in front of their name,” Dr. Bernard said. “Patients don’t know that it’s almost more like an academic type of a doctorate than a clinical doctorate.”
The AMA’s truth-in-advertising campaign aims to ensure that all health professionals clearly and honestly state their level of training, education and licensing.
An AMA-led coalition of 108 national, state and specialty medical societies, has been active in dozens of states this year working to block legislation that would provide inappropriate expansion of the medical services and procedures nonphysician health professionals are allowed to perform.
Learn more about the AMA’s wide-ranging fight against scope creep.
https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/scope-practice/physician-authors-explore-what-rise-nps-pas-means-patientsClearly medical practices and hospitals can do better for their patients.
I’ve also noticed the increased use of PAs and NPs in speciality doctor practices! This is outrageous.
PA/NP advocates are pushing for total autonomy with NO oversight/management by Medical Doctors!!!
-
A Defense of Western Christian Colonialism

Much has been asserted in recent years by revisionist historians and neo-Marxist activists claiming the Western colonization of the New World (primarily South America and Central America) and Africa was a great act of evil that brought only unwanted misery and terror.
Such superficial and sensationalistic claims are easily refuted using actual history and sound reasoning.
The truth is that the Western colonization of the world (Africa, the New World, etc.) brought about an enormous amount of good. I’d argue that the net good far outweighed the negatives. In Africa, the native tribes had no scientific or mathematical knowledge to speak of for thousands of years. It had no great cities. Egyptians are not black-skinned Africans, yet black activists continue to claim the Egyptian civilization as its own accomplishment. In fact, in over 1,900 years Africa did not produce so much as a two-story building. It had no great literary or musical achievements. It was economically a subsistence primitive agrarian level. In fact, civilization was at a standstill in Africa for thousands of years with no great universities or centers of learning (not Greek, Roman, or Egyptian; I’m talking about the achievements of native black-skinned African people). Within 50, 100, 200, or 300 years of the Western colonization of Africa, they became transformed into a level of education, commerce, farming, higher education, medicine, technology, military, the arts, music, literature, philosophy, biology, architecture, and the sciences which were undreamed of in centuries past. Millions of lives were saved.
The much balleyhoed cultural imperialism is a myth. The best of Western culture was gifted to Africa and the New World, whilst the natives still preserved their own vibrant cultures and unique expressions which continue to the present day.
But thus far I’ve been speaking of pragmatic and materialistic considerations. The greatest achievement, the great gift the West gave to the New World and Africa was the Christian faith. Today there is still religious fighting in Africa, but the horrific seemingly neverending great tribal wars have ended. And the sporadic cases of violence we see today in Africa are nearly 100% due to radical Islam. Through the direct efforts of the Colonizers, God used them in a mighty way to spread the Gospel where before was only darkness, spiritual blindness, pagan superstitions, animism, witchcraft, ancestor worship, and voodoo.
In South America and Central America the bloody Aztec empire slaughtered millions of innocent people in its pagan blood lust.

For all the problems of the Spanish Conquistadors, and they did have issues, their putting an end to the brutal ritual of human sacrifice of the Aztecs was a very good thing.
Not all cultures or civilizations are equal. Not all religions are equal. Christianity is the only religion that is true. All those following other religions are damned. This is opposed to the politically correct view which enshrines diversity and equality as fundamental truths. By literally dozens of metrics Western society was and is superior to the pagan and primitive societies they replaced.
Again, let me be clear of one fact: the culture and civilization of Africa and the New World was vastly inferior (to a very, very large degree) to that of the West by virtually any way you could measure it.
These colonized nations should thank God and be appreciative of all that the colonizers gave them. The Gospel pulled them out of the darkness. Their level of education, literacy, medicine, technology, scientific and industrial knowledge, music, literature, the arts, and many more things all improved dramatically.
apologetics, archaeology, Bible, blacks, Christian theology, Christianity, global, history, islam, popular culture, Protestant, Reformed, Roman, science, South America, The West, theology, whitesAfrica, Africans, ancestor worship, animism, blacks, Caucasian, Central America, civilizations, colonialism, cultural, cultural Marxism, culture, dark-skinned, history, inferiority, islam, measures, metrics, New World, revisionist history, societies, South America, superiority, The West, tribal warfare, tribes, voodoo, Western civilization, Western culture, white, witchcraft -
Christ the King

Hail Christ the King
The Lord of Lords
It is His praises I singBorn in a humble manger so small
He would redeem man
From the curse of the FallHe is fully God and fully man
Because of love
He enacted the Father’s planMan was lost in sin
We needed a Savior to ransom us
A holy propitiationChrist came to save
Those who would repent and believe
To sin we would no longer be a slave“It is finished!” He cried
And thus Christ gave up His life
The God Man had diedWas that rugged cross of Calvary the end
Was the Son of Man no more
The Apostles were frightenedOn the third day you see
No longer held captive by death
Christ was set freeJesus rose from the grave
Oh glorious event
Man He would now be able to saveHe reigns supreme over all
The Alpha and Omega
Before Christ seraphim do fallSo repent and trust in Christ alone today
We are saved by God’s sovereign grace
I implore you to follow Christ, He is the Wayby Zachary Uram
(c) 2023 -
Daycare: American Dream or Dystopian Nightmare

One of the most destructive things to negatively impact the family in modern times has been the enormously popular trend of parents having their children raised in daycare, instead of the traditional model where the husband works and the mother is a full-time stay-at-mom who tends to her children’s development with nurturing, care, love, attention, and discipline. All of these critical qualities are severely lacking in even the best daycare centers.
Parents warehouse their children here for 10-16 hours per day. The children are being paid by largely unskilled, unmotivated, minimum wage (or slightly higher) workers who are overburdened caring for dozens of kids and are stressed out. This toxic scenario is hardly the ideal environment for a child during its most formative and impressionable years. It is critical that parents bond with their children in these early years, and especially so for the bonding between mother and child.
It’s also critical that children receive proper discipline and structure. Scripture commands the use of corporal punishment, and it’s illegal to employ it in daycare centers.
This environment can create a perfect storm of factors that negatively affect a child’s early childhood development. This early development (cognitive, physical, social emotional, and spiritual) we know is super critical to a child’s overall well-being and future health. Most children who have this excellent early childhood development grow up to be responsible, moral, law-abiding, and productive members of society who eschew hedonism, alcohol, and drug abuse.
We have literally tens of millions of kids who have spent 10-16 hours every day in daycare because both parents are working full-time! I thank God my father worked so hard and put in 16-18 hour days at work so Mommy could be a full-time stay-at-home Mom. Children are now being raised by strangers during their most formative years who could care less about them!! It’s awful! There is no way some daycare employee is going to nurture, love, teach and support a child the way their mother would!
Economics plays a huge role in this phenomenon. Up until the 1970s daycare was unheard of. Some women had part-time jobs and if they were away from home a trusted family member would watch their job. But that was a very small minority of cases. In the 20-year period between 1980-2000, the number of daycares that opened was astronomical! And further, if you look at the past 20 years the numbers are even more shocking. It’s so bad that now a majority of American kids are being raised in daycare. The elephant in the room is the fact that these children are suffering because their mothers choose to have a career and put a certain higher level of material comfort over the needs of their families. The rise in feminism perfectly correlates with the rise in daycare.
Women are brainwashed by their parents and public schools that they must go to university and get a career. For 50 years now we’ve seen the results of this social experiment and the fruits are very bitter. There are many cases where the mother could be a stay-at-home Mom if her husband and her cut back dramatically on expenses. They don’t need a $200,000 to $400,000 home, a $60,000 SUV, or $80,000 truck, or expensive vacations, or expensive jewelry, a new wardrobe every few years, or eating out at restaurants every week.
There are so many things that are non-essential luxuries, yet many have convinced themselves if they wish to achieve the American Dream these material comforts are essential. I know that these parents love their children, yet they are trapped and have been conditioned to believe certain things which aren’t true.
Another thing to consider is: daycare (even the cheapest) is expensive. I once saw a report by an economist that said if you calculate the cost of daycare that would be saved if the mother was a stay-at-home Mom and coupled it with the tax savings, in many cases, it was actually better economically to have the mother not work, or it would have been about the same cost savings. So the line that most mothers absolutely must work is a total fabrication!
Sadly, I must also note that ever year many children in daycare are physically or sexually abused.
Looking back at my childhood, I am so very thankful for my parents making sacrifices and working so hard for my sisters and I. Having Mommy at home was a huge blessing. We may not have had the best house, car, or been able to take luxury vacations, but we had lots of love and are to this day a very closeknit family!
America, Bible, Christian theology, Christianity, daycare, economics, feminism, government, history, law, marriage, womenabuse, America, American Dream, bonding, child abuse, children, daycare, decline of the West, discipline, downsizing, dystopian, early childhood, early childhood development, economics, family, guidance, hedonism, kids, love, luxuries, material comfort, materialism, nightmare, nuture, parents, psychology, sexual abuse, structure, tax law, taxes, The West -
A Primer on Salvation

Does man have free choice as it pertains to salvation?
I believe a careful study of Scripture will reveal that man has the ability to make choices, yet we are not totally free in our moral agency. This is due to the fact that the natural man, before he is saved, is spiritually dead and is thus limited in the degrees of freedom he has. He is a slave to his nature which is wholly sinful. He cannot make certain choices, such as choosing Christ, in this fallen sinful state. Due to total depravity man’s will is only free to choose evil.
Imagine a prisoner locked in a cell. Within the cell (his moral nature) he can make real choices that are free, he can pace the floor, read a book, or whistle a tune. However he cannot walk outisde the cell. His nature (the cell) traps him inside and prevents him from making certain choices. So too are we dead in our sinful nature and can act only according to that nature, in other words, we can only choose the actions which our nature permits.

And you were dead in your trespasses and sins,
Ephesians 2:1even when we were dead in our transgressions, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved),
Ephesians 2:5When you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions,
Colossians 2:13For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace,
Romans 8:6If Christ is in you, though the body is dead because of sin, yet the spirit is alive because of righteousness.
Romans 8:10It’s like expecting a dead man on the operating theatre to jump up and dance an Irish jig. It’s not going to happen unless the heart is shocked back to life. Without God’s sovereign grace selecting us (predestined at the foundation of the world) and quickening spiritual life into our dead soul thus regeneration us, we would remain spiritually lost.

The natural man has a heart of stone. When we are saved we’re given a heart of flesh.
And I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you. And I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh.
Ezekiel 36:26Salvation is a monergistic process, it occurs solely through the work of God. Some such as Orthodox, Catholics, and Arminian Protestants assert that salvation is a synergistic process of man and God working together. This is utter heresy and is condemned by Scripture. This semi-Pelagian belief that man has a share in his salvation contradicts Scripture which is clear that man is spiritually dead in his trespasses and unable to choose God.

All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out.
John 6:37No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him. And I will raise him up on the last day.
John 6:44For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.
Ephesians 2:8-9God’s sovereign grace which regenerates a man is irresistible. Imagine a person who nearly drowned and is on the beach hanging between life and death. The lifeguard alone can save their life, and when he begins working on the person this is irresistible. So too does the Holy Spirit move when quickening a man.

This doesn’t mean a person is saved kicking and screaming against their will. God conditions them and works a miracle giving them a new heart which is receptive to faith which is a gift. Regeneration always precedes faith.
“To say that we are able by our own efforts to think good thoughts or give God spiritual obedience before we are spiritually regenerate is to overthrow the gospel and the faith of the universal church in all ages.” – John Owen

even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love he predestined us for adoption to himself as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will,
Ephesians 1:4-5So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy.
Romans 9:16These passages clearly indicate that God chose certain people, the Elect, for salvation prior even to the creation of the universe! This process was wholly independent of their merits, abilities, or any other intrinsic metric. These verses suggest salvation is the result of a “single force”: a mono-ergon. That single force is God, the one and only person responsible for salvation!
Here are some excellent essays on monergistic regeneration.

I found this excellent sermon which portrays vividly monergism at work in the example of the maid raised to life from death by Jesus:
SALVATION IS MONERGISTIC by Dr. R. L. Hymers, Jr. A sermon preached on Lord’s Day Evening, March 6, 2005
at the Baptist Tabernacle of Los Angeles “And he put them all out, and took her by the hand, and called, saying, Maid, arise. And her spirit came again, and she arose straightway: and he commanded to give her meat” (Luke 8:54-55).Matthew, Mark and Luke all record this miracle. When Jesus returned from Gadara on the other side of the Sea of Galilee, great throngs of people gathered around Him. There were two people in the crowd that were in desperate need. One was a woman who had an issue of blood for twelve years. The other was a man named Jairus, whose twelve year old daughter was dying in bed back home. Jesus began to talk with this man about going to his house to heal his daughter. In the meantime, the woman with an issue of blood reached out through the crowd and touched Him. She was healed immediately. Jesus stopped talking with this man Jairus about his daughter, and turned around to have a conversation with the woman who had been healed. While he was speaking to the woman, someone came from Jairus’ house and whispered to him that his daughter had already died. The man told Jairus,
“Thy daughter is dead; trouble not the Master” (Luke 8:49).
But Jairus was insistent. Matthew tells us that he said to Jesus,
“My daughter is even now dead: but come and lay thy hand upon her, and she shall live” (Matthew 9:18).
Jesus went with Jairus to his house. A crowd of people were outside weeping and wailing over her death. Jesus said,
“Weep not; she is not dead, but sleepeth” (Luke 8:52).
They stopped weeping and actually laughed at Him. They knew she was dead. She had already been dead for some time before He got there.
Jesus put them all out of the house. But Mark adds a detail. Peter and James and John, and the dead girl’s parents remained in the room.
“But when he had put them all out, he taketh the father and the mother of the [girl], and them that were with him, and entered in where the [girl] was lying” (Mark 5:40).
Jesus had put all those who were weeping and wailing out of the house, and went in with Peter, James, John, and the girl’s parents, to the room where her dead body was lying.
“And he put them all out, and took her by the hand, and called, saying, Maid [girl], arise. And her spirit came again, and she arose straightway [right away]: and he commanded to give her meat. And her parents were astonished; but he charged them that they should tell no man what was done” (Luke 8:54-56).
I think there are certain very valuable lessons we can learn from this miracle that will not only help you to be converted, if you are lost, but will also help those who are doing evangelism, bringing in lost people to hear the gospel preached, as many of you are laboring to do.
I. First, consider the purpose of this miracle.
It was obviously a miracle, and a very great one. The girl was certainly dead by the time Jesus got there. Her body was probably already washed and prepared in a preliminary way for burial, at least to some extent. The Jews didn’t wait around like we do today. It was their custom to bury a dead body the same day it died. This is still done in many parts of the world, such as Central America, where my wife was born. That’s still the custom in Guatemala, El Salvador, and other parts of Central America. You don’t wait around because they often don’t have proper refrigeration to keep a dead body preserved for several days. This is also true in remote parts of China and Southeast Asia, and other parts of the Third World, like Africa. The fact that the mourners had already come to the house and were wailing and weeping outside, shows that they had time to get there, and the girl had been dead for some time before Jesus arrived on the scene.
What was the purpose of Jesus Christ in raising her from the dead? Many people died while Jesus was doing His ministry. Twice we are told that Jesus healed all that came to Him (Matthew 12:15; Matthew 14:14). We may get the impression that He healed every sick person in Israel. But I do not think that was true. I think these healing times were specimen cases – to show that He could heal because He was the Messiah, the Saviour.
This, I believe, is also true when He raised the dead. He did not raise everyone who died during His three-year earthly ministry. He only raised three people from physical death – the widow of Nain’s son; this girl, Jairus’ daughter; and Lazarus, his friend. Those are the only three people Jesus raised from the dead during the three years of His ministry on earth. Others died during this time, undoubtedly a great many of them. But Jesus only raised those three from death.
He raised these three people for a reason, a very definite reason. Jesus didn’t just do things. He always had a reason for doing them. What, then, was His reason for resurrecting these three young people from death? I think the answer lies in the Apostle Paul’s statement in I Timothy 1:15.
“Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners”
(I Timothy 1:15).I Timothy 1:15 tells us that the main reason Jesus came into the world was “to save sinners.” Each healing recorded in the four gospels is given as an illustration of that great truth. Jesus’ main reason for performing these three miraculous resurrections showed, or illustrated (or we might say typified) a certain important aspect of His ministry of saving sinners (I Timothy 1:15).
I say this for two reasons. First, because these three resurrection miracles Jesus performed were such perfect pictures of the new birth He gives to sinners, who are dead in trespasses and sins (Ephesians 2:1, 5). Also, because these three raisings from the dead picture so perfectly the monergistic nature of salvation. The word “monergism” means “by one power” – that of God. In contrast to that, “synergism” refers to the combining of powers – that of God and man. These three resurrections Jesus performed show that regeneration is accomplished by one power (God’s), not by the combined power of God and man, cooperating with God.
II. Second, the resurrection of this girl is a perfect picture of regeneration;
her raising from the dead typified all true new birth experiences.These three physical resurrections were completely monergistic, to use the technical theological term, which I think is a good one. Monergism means that a person is born again and converted completely by the grace and power of Christ, without human help. Synergism is the belief that man provides some help by cooperating with Christ in the salvation of his soul. Synergism is what many evangelicals believe today, as a result of faulty theology and the influence of many modern revivalists since Finney. Pure Pelagianism is the third view. It holds that man is saved solely by an act of his own will. Pure Pelagianism is what Charles G. Finney taught, illustrated by the title of one of his most famous sermons, “Sinners Bound to Change Their Own Hearts.” He preached that all up and down America – that people could regenerate themselves by a “change of choice.”
Now it is clear from the story of Jairus’ daughter that Finney was not right. Since her resurrection by Jesus is a prototype of the new birth and conversion, it is very clear that Finney was wrong. The girl did not resurrect herself. She was dead. Stone dead. This account of her resurrection also shows, I believe, that synergism (sometimes called “semi-Pelagianism”) is also wrong. The dead girl couldn’t contribute one thing to her resurrection from death. The entire work was monergistic. God did the whole work of raising her to life through His Son, Jesus Christ. The girl contributed nothing at all.
Now if that isn’t the correct understanding of this miracle, I don’t know what is. The Bible says so quite strongly,
“And you hath he quickened [made alive], who were dead in trespasses and sins” (Ephesians 2:1).
The whole quickening, making alive, of a dead soul is monergistic. God does the whole thing, from start to finish, without any help or cooperation from man. The Apostle John makes that quite clear when he says, that those who believe savingly,
“Were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God” (John 1:13).
The whole act of salvation, not part of it, is done by God in Christ. That’s monergism. And that is the teaching of this miracle, as well as the rest of the Bible. That was the teaching of John Bunyan, our great Baptist forefather, as well as the teaching of the great evangelists George Whitefield, John Wesley, and Asahel Nettleton, who so strongly disagreed with Finney.
Monergism was the view of almost all the great evangelistic preachers, like Gilbert Tennent, Jonathan Edwards, C. H. Spurgeon, and Martyn Lloyd-Jones. It was the teaching of the earlier Reformers as well – Martin Luther and John Calvin. It was the teaching of the great pioneer missionaries like William Carey, who founded modern missions, and David Livingstone, who opened Africa for Christ, as well as the men who went as missionaries to open China in the nineteenth century, and John Nevius, whose influence opened Korea to the gospel.
None of these great historical figures in evangelism and missions believed that man could make a new heart for himself, as Finney did, or that man could cooperate and help God convert him in any way, as the later evangelists did. No, these early men were all monergists. They all believed that salvation was a work of God in Christ – without the aid of man in any way – pure, old-fashioned monergism.
Isn’t that what you see in this story of Jairus’ daughter? Christ came in to the room,
“And he put them all out, and took her by the hand, and called, saying, Maid, arise. And her spirit came again, and she arose straightway: and he commanded to give her meat”
(Luke 8:54-55).III. Third, the resurrection of this girl did not depend on any “decision”
on her part, nor did it depend on the prayers of her friends,
or on their help.It was solely, monergistically, dependent on the power and grace of Christ alone! Today we live in a time of decisionism. It has been so ingrained in us that we think we have to help people, or at least they have to help themselves be converted. Nearly every book I read on revival tells us that revival depends on God’s people preparing themselves for it, by fasting and prayer, and other efforts. But that is synergism, man doing his part, and God doing His part as a result. I don’t see that in the New Testament. What I see there is monergistic revival, revival totally dependent on the work of God with man playing no part in it. In fact, since we have switched to man preparing himself to bring about revival – there has been no revival of any consequence. Why? The great revival in the Book of Jonah gives the answer:
“Salvation is of the Lord” (Jonah 2:9).
And this is not only true of revival, where many people are converted. It is also true of each individual conversion. I am not telling you you shouldn’t pray for revivals or for individual conversions. Of course you should. The Bible repeatedly tells us to pray for these things. But our prayers do not make revivals or cause individuals to get saved. They don’t “make it happen!” God makes it happen in Christ! Salvation of an individual, or of many people in revival, is totally in the hands of God.
We can yell and scream and pray like the people did who came to Jairus’ house and it will do no good at all. Haven’t we been doing things like that for years, fasting, praying, preparing – and yet has revival or many individual conversions come of it? They have not. We need to go back to the old way of our forefathers and depend on God in Christ alone for salvation!
IV. Fourth, what this means to you if you are still unconverted.
It means that you must stop looking to yourself. You will find nothing in yourself to help you come to Christ. The Bible says that your
“heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked”
(Jeremiah 17:9).Your heart is so full of tricks and deceptions that it will fool you every time. Your heart is not only deceitful, it is also innately and habitually in rebellion against God. The Apostle Paul said,
“Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be”
(Romans 8:7).Your heart can’t obey God. It has the seeds of Adam’s sin controlling it. It has your actual sins polluting it even further. You are just like the Ephesians (who were exactly like all human beings),
“Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart” (Ephesians 4:18).
With your heart in this depraved condition, there is really nothing you can do to help God save you.
Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones once said,
It is perfectly clear in the pages of the New Testament that no man can be saved until, at some time or other, he has felt desperate about himself…(Iain H. Murray, D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones: The First Forty Years, Banner of Truth Trust, 1983 reprint, page 207).
Why would you feel the need for Jesus and His Blood to cleanse you if you have not had such an experience? Why would you need Jesus at all if you were not a ruined, dead sinner?
“And he put them all out, and took her by the hand, and called, saying, Maid, arise. And her spirit came again, and she arose straightway: and he commanded to give her meat”
(Luke 8:54-55).A ruler once came to Jesus by night To ask Him the way of salvation and light;
The Master made answer in words true and plain, “Ye must be born again.”
“Ye must be born again, Ye must be born again,
I verily, verily, say unto you, Ye must be born again.”
(“Ye Must Be Born Again” by William T. Sleeper, 1819-1904).May God grant you the grace and faith to come to Jesus Christ. Amen.
https://www.rlhymersjr.com/Online_Sermons/2005/030605PM_SalvationIsMonergistic.htmlapologetics, Bible, Catholic church, Catholicism, Christian theology, Christianity, justification, Orthodox church, Protestant, Reformed, theologyArminian, Arminian Protestants, born again, Born from above, Calvinism, Catholic, choices, enslaved to sin, free choices, free will, grace, heart of flesh, heart of stone, human will, irresistible grace, John Owen, justification, monergism, monergistic regeneration, moral agency, nature, New Birth, new heart, Orthodox, sin nature, Sola Fide, Sola Gratia, soteriology, sovereign grace, synergism, total depravity, will





