-
God’s children: Natural Birth or New Birth

We’ve all heard the popular assertion, “We are all God’s children.”, but is this slogan really a true statement of fact according to Scripture?
In this article we shall examine that question and see what Scripture has to say about it.
If we carefully study and exegete Scripture relating to this topic, four things stand out in stark contrast:
- Scripture is clear, only regenerated, born again believers are God’s children.
At the time one is saved, they are adopted into God’s family. The context is we are spiritual children, not physical. The story of the Bible is the story of adoption. We Elect are adopted into God’s spiritual family as a chosen child of God. The logical inference we can make from these truth propositions from Scripture is that if only the Elect are God’s children, then all the non-Elect are not God’s children! So we are not God’s children by virtue of our natural birth (when we were born), but rather it is determined on the basis of our new birth in Christ. This makes some people uncomfortable. Nevertheless, as Christians we have a duty to stand on God’s Word. - Scripture is also clear that Satan is the father of the unregenerate.
For the totally depraved unregenerate, all their thoughts, ways, and inclinations are according to their nature. Thus they are wholly evil, all the time, and they are truly Satan’s children. They are God’s enemies, and they do his will, not God’s will. We can only do God’s will when we have been spiritually brought to life from being spiritually dead. - Scripture is clear that the unregenerate do not possess the image of God.
The number one rejoinder I hear, from people who believe every single person ever born are God’s children, is that we are made in the image of God; thus that proves we are God’s children. That is totally wrong. First being made in God’s image means we are created above mere animals (evolution is false and Satanic) and have self-perception and sentience. We can reason. We can create and destroy. However, as I argue in one of my blog posts (you can find it linked to below), I believe, as well as many of the leading Reformed thinkers, we lost this image in the Fall. The unregenerate do not have God’s image. This image is restored to us when we are regenerated. Certainly the unregenerate can reason. But they absolutely cannot reason and discern spiritual truths. - We can have absolute assurance we are God’s children.
Scripture says that the Holy Spirit communicates with our spirit that we are God’s children. This inner witness will be there for every regenerate person.
The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God.
Romans 8:16This Scripture relates to point 4 above.
The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.
1 Corinthians 2:14This Scripture relates to point 3 above.
The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.
2 Corinthians 4:4This Scripture relates to point 3 above. This amazing Scripture informs us that God Himself has blinded the unbeliever’s (unregenerate) minds so that they cannot repent and have faith. Only when the Holy Spirit quickens their soul from a dead state to an alive state, and He imparts the gifts of repentance and faith, do they become regenerate and able to discern spiritual matters.
“But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name.”
John 1:12This Scripture relates to point 1 above.
Speaking to a group of Jews, Jesus says:
“You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”
John 8:44This Scripture relates to point 2 above. Jesus was speaking to the Jewish Pharisees, but the truth He conveys to us is applicable to all unbelievers.
“God decided in advance to adopt us into his own family by bringing us to himself through Jesus Christ. This is what he wanted to do, and it gave him great delight.”
Ephesians 1:5This Scripture relates to point 1 above.
By this it is evident who are the children of God, and who are the children of the devil: whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor is the one who does not love his brother.
1 John 3:10This Scripture relates to point 2 above.
adoption, article, assurance, believers, born again, Christ, Christian, Christianity, contrast, Devil, elect, evolution, faith, father, God, God the Father, God’s children, grace, Holy Spirit, Image of God, Jesus, Jesus Christ, natural birth, New Birth, regenerate, repentance, Satan, Satan’s children, sovereign grace, spiritual adoption, Trinity, Triune God, unbelievers, unregenerate - Scripture is clear, only regenerated, born again believers are God’s children.
-
A Rejoinder to Reformed Presbyterians and Reformed Baptists

Saints, for 20 years I’ve had only Presbyterians giving me hate, denigrating me, belittling me, ridiculing me, mocking me, being dismissive and haughty and insisting I am not Reformed. I finally got so sick of the abuse. I reached a breaking point, and that was the catalyst for my recent blog article on being Reformed.
When I shared my article, “A Response to Reformed Presbyterians: Semper Reformanda”, which you can view below at the link, on my Facebook timeline. It created a firestorm of controversy. I was mocked, insulted, belittled, my sanity was questioned, and my arguments were totally dismissed without being addressed. I’d say 95% of those Christians who responded failed to grasp the nuance of my arguments, and it went totally over their heads.
Despite literally dozens of people asserting that my article was garbage and that I was not Reformed, not a single one of them refuted a single argument I made. One person referenced the article, and was in error in what they said the article asserted.
I honestly believe the vast majority of people on Facebook who commented never read my article. Is it so much to ask for 20 minutes of their time to read it?
This blog post represents my final rejoinder to my critics and adversaries.
I’m getting tired of repeating myself, but I affirm a Reformed confession – the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith. I affirm 95% of it, I differ only on eschatology and covenant theology. I AM REFORMED! In fact, not only am I truly Reformed, but I’m more Reformed than Presbyterians because I adhere 100% to Sola Scriptura and I have a reformed eschatology (premillennialism), a truly reformed hermeneutic (a dispensational hermeneutic – historical-grammatic contextual literalism), and I agree with Scripture on the Church-Israel distinction. Also because I reject the unbiblical practice of infant baptism.
I had many people on Facebook assert I don’t hold to the 1689 LBCF when in fact I do, I just differ on eschatology and covenant theology. So it seems ridiculous and intellectually dishonest to assert I must have 100% conformance to the confession when I agree with virtually all of it (95%). It seems some people are so bigoted they must deny me what is my rightful and proper designation to describe my theological beliefs. How sad and pathetic.
By the way, I’m chided for holding to dispensational views (I’m actually a leaky dispensationalist like Dr. John MacArthur), yet covenant theology is less than a hundred years older than dispensationalism (in it’s fully realized and codified state – major tenets of dispensationalism date back to the Early Church period). In fact, not a single Magisterial Reformer, such as Luther or Calvin, held to covenant theology! Yet Presbyterians and some Reformed Baptists act as if covenant theology is the sine qua non of Reformed theology. It isn’t.
We should keep in mind that the Reformed Confessions, as useful as they may be, like the 1689 LBCF, or the Westminster Confession, are in fact secondary documents subordinate to Scripture. They are not perfect. They are not God-breathed. Secondary documents, like confessions, theological books, sermons, and commentaries, are profitable tools that we can utilize in understanding the Scriptures, as well as honing in on what we believe and sharpening our doctrine, but only to the extent that they accurately and faithfully represent the Scriptures. We must always be Sola Scriptura Bereans in our study of Scripture and in our formulation of doctrine whether it be confessions or creeds.
As I briefly mentioned earlier in this post, asserting that I must have 100% conformance with the 1689 confession in order to affirm it ,when in fact I do affirm 95% of it and differ only on eschatology and covenant theology, is akin to saying if I eat 95% of an apple I didn’t really eat an apple! If you assume one must have 100% conformity to a confession that is just stupid. I will repeat myself ONE MORE TIME: I AFFIRM 95% OF THE LBCF! If you keep insisting that I am not Reformed or that I don’t affirm the LBCF I will have nothing further to say to you. I’m not going to spend hours arguing in circles with any of you anymore. Life is too short. If you reject all my arguments in my blog article on being Reformed that’s your right, but my article is my fullest and final exposition on my reasoning and my position!!!!
I am FULLY and truly Reformed and FULLY and truly a Reformed Baptist. If you disagree, that’s your problem. Nothing you can say or do will convince me otherwise. The truth is on my side!
In conclusion, let me say that despite the massive amount of hate I’ve received, I forgive them and do not hate them. I pray the Lord would open their eyes and show them how they’ve wronged me – a faithful brother in Christ. I pray they would keep reforming and come fully into line with biblical truth.
Semper Reformanda!
apologetics, Bible, Christian theology, Christianity, covenant theology, dispensationalism, Eschatology, Protestant, Reformed, theologyattacks, Baptist, bias, bigotry, Calvin, covenant theology, CT, designation, dismissive, Dispensational, dispensationalism, Fully Reformed, God-breathed, hatred, hermeneutic, identity, label, Luther, Magisterial Reformers, personal, Presbyterian, reformation, Reformed, Reformed Baptist, rejoinder, ridiculing, Semper Reformanda, sine qua non, theology, Truly Reformed -
A Doxology

Now praise the Father
And the Son
With the Holy Spirit
Three in OneWe give to You
Our highest praise
We shall worship You
All our daysChrist ransomed us
From eternal perdition
You cannot be saved
By your own volitionWe are saved by
Grace alone
It was Christ
Who did atoneGod chose His elect
Before the world’s foundation
It was totally by His good pleasure
This act alone saved us from damnationWe Reformed affirm
The doctrines of grace
Otherwise known as Calvinism
We run the good raceSpread the gospel
To friend and foe
We plant the seed
The Holy Spirit lets it growOne must hear the gospel
And sincerely repent
They must then believe the gospel
This is a one time eventWe are justified
On the basis of faith alone
Works play no part
Christ is our cornerstoneTotally unmerited is
Sovereign grace
It alone can save
The human raceby Zachary Uram
(c) 2023 -
A Response to Reformed Presbyterians: Semper Reformanda

Background
The sine qua non of Reformed theology is soteriology. Covenant theology and certain types of eschatology are not essential core distinctives.
Sadly, the majority of Reformed Presbyterians seem to be so bigoted and locked into their infantile theological cliques that they look down upon and refuse to recognize believers such as Reformed Baptists as being worthy of the Reformed label. The arrogance and lack of charity is both astounding and nauseating.
Like the Pharisees, who Christ rebuked, they sat in the chair of Moses and demanded everyone obey them. The truth is that they were following man made traditions, rather than the Scripture alone.
These self-appointed haughty and smug gatekeepers of all things Reformed seem to take pleasure in informing other believers that they’re not Reformed! They need to humble themselves and repent!
Their argument for excluding folks like me is akin to arguing that only Germany is a European country!!
I have taken enough abuse from these myopic Presbyterians! I AM REFORMED!!!
Reforming What?
The principle of reforming comes directly from Scripture. The Reformers didn’t invent this concept, they recognized it and applied it. We should be continually reforming our doctrine to conform and match what Scripture teaches. Is there any Christians who are so arrogant they believe their interpretation of Scripture is perfect and infallible? I think not. If they did they’d be heretical and likely cultists.
For a detailed treatment of what it means to be Reformed please see my blog post referenced below, “What Does It Mean to Be Reformed?”.
Magisterial Reformers
Do the Reformers get to define what being Reformed means? No! They were a catalyst for theological discussion and rediscovery of doctrine, but they did not discover anything novel or new. The Reformation was a return to biblical orthodoxy. We should not confuse the non-essential distinctives the Reformers held, such as ecclesiology, the regulated principle of worship, eschatology such as amillennialism and postmillennialism, and covenant theology, with the essential core distinctives of Reformed theology which are defined by Scripture alone! Being good Bereans and Sola Scriptura adherents we know that ALL doctrine comes from careful study of the Scriptures.
Maybe being amillennial (a vestige left over from Roman Catholicism – seems in some areas the Reformers didn’t reform enough), and adhering to covenant theology was a popular position in the 16th and 17th centuries. However that doesn’t imply we modern believers must hold to it as if they are essential distinctives!
Confessions
These non-essential views made their way into Reformed confessions and once that happened the majority of Reformed believers became convinced that because a certain theological proposition was codified in a confession it must be both unchallengeable as well as an essential distinctive. This was a grave and tragic mistake.
Dispensational and Reformed?
As I argue in one of my blog posts, “Covenant Theology vs Dispensationalism: Towards a Definition of Reformed Essentials”, referenced below, one can be fully Reformed while holding to a dispensational premillennial eschatology. It is true that for some dispensationalists they have 2 different paths to salvation and a non-Reformed soteriology, but that is not so in my case. I consider myself to be a Reformed Baptist who agrees with 95% of the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith, and who holds to a premillennial eschatology.
So Much Hate
Such is the hatred and bigotry of many Reformed Presbyterians that they even refuse to allow the label of Reformed to be used by 1689 Reformed Baptists who DO hold to covenant theology!
Some Reformed Presbyterians seem to hold to infant baptism (paedobaptism) as an essential core distinctive, but if one is a careful student of Scripture they will see that is wrong, and that the credobaptist position (believer’s baptism) is correct.
Observations
In my interactions with hundreds of Reformed Presbyterians online I’ve noticed the following:
- Some will deny you the Reformed label if you do not hold to infant baptism.
- Some will deny you the Reformed label if you hold to a dispensational understanding of eschatology.
- Some will deny you the Reformed label if you don’t hold to one of the historic Reformed Confessions 100% with no disagreement.
I will continue to be Reformed and carefully examine my doctrinal beliefs and compare them with what the Holy Spirit shows me in Scripture.
Just Who Is Truly Reformed?
I maintain that those Reformed like me, who haven’t turned off their minds and hitched themselves to 100% adherence to a Reformed confession without any possible variance, are stuck in the 16th century and have sadly never advanced past the non-essentials held by the Magisterial Reformers, such as Luther and Calvin, which they conflate with essentials, are the truly Reformed. I have Reformed beyond their static and anachronistic theology in the areas of eschatology and baptism.
Sola Scriptura
Sadly, many of these Reformed Presbyterians are guilty of the Appeal to Authority logical fallacy. I think for myself, I hold to Sola Scriptura and get my doctrinal beliefs SOLELY from Scripture. At the end of the day every Reformed confession, and every theological opinion of Reformers is subordinate to the authority of Scripture. But Reformed Presbyterians know this, so it’s odd that they have painted themselves into a corner doctrinally and cannot further reform. Sadly this is precisely what the Roman Catholic church did, and what the Magisterial Reformers rightly protested and challenged, even at the risk of their own lives.
Conclusion
In conclusion, let me say that I love my Presbyterian brothers and sisters. And it’s my fervent desire that they will reform further. This post was a long time coming and reflects over 20 years of animosity and bigotry directed at me by Reformed Presbyterians for holding to what I believe are biblical theological positions. And intentionally excluding me from their club. So this post may be a bit strident and reactionary. If I have offended you please forgive me. I will keep contending for the truth as God leads me into all truth! Soli Deo Gloria.
My closing advice: Semper Reformanda (Always [Be] Reforming) saints! Don’t let Presbyterians or any Christian bully, denigrate, belittle, or be dismissive towards you for being truly Reformed!
apologetics, Bible, Catholic church, Catholicism, Christian theology, Christianity, covenant theology, dispensationalism, Eschatology, Evangelical, Lutheran, Protestant, Puritans, Reformed, theology, worship1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith, 5 Pillars of Reformed Theology, Always Reforming, amillennialism, arrogance, baptism, beliefs, believer's baptism, Berean, Bible, bigotry, Calvin, Christ, Christianity, Christians, cliques, club, confessions, core, covenant theology, covenants, credobaptism, CT, Dispensational, dispensationalism, distinctives, doctrine, essentials, gatekeepers, Germany, Jesus, Jesus Christ, labels, Luther, Magisterial Reformers, Moses, nonessentials, paedobaptism, Papist, postmillennialism, premillenialism, Presbyterians, primacy of Scripture, principle, Protestant, Reformed, Reformed Confessions, Reformed Presbyterians, Reformers, Roman, Rome, Romish, Scripture, Scripture Alone, Scriptures, semper reformanda, Sola Scriptura, Soli Deo Gloria, study, theological bigotry, theology, Truly Reformed -
Untitled poem by my sister Vi
When I visited,
my Gramma
always
smiled
at me
and
I always yelled,
“Hi Gramma!”
My Dad
would be
sitting on
the flowered couch,
bothered by
the hot weather,
the Pirates
were on,
the overhead fan
whirred
but
it was
so hot
it really
didn’t help
much
and
after I sat there
for a while,
my dear Gramma
would yell (because the TV was so loud),
“Hey Vi – go to the cellar
and get a pop!”
my Dad
protested,
and Gramma
always said,
“Aww, Joey,
let Vi
get a pop! It’s hot out
there today!”
so I walked down
the narrow steps
and
I opened the big Fridgedaire
fridge (from the 1940s)
and a blast of cold air hit me,
and I say there, on the
beat up old couch,
listening to my Dadby Violet Uram
-
My Dear Sister Vi
You help my back
When it goes out of whackYou are so kind and sweet
You can’t be beatYou cook me delicious food
It always puts me in a good moodYou do my laundry without complaint
Truly, you are a saintMy dear Posie
You make my life so rosyMy days are blue
Without youYou shop the supermarket for deals
And you cook me gourmet mealsYou vacuum, mop, and clean our home
From you I’ll never roamWhen I’m depressed like a sad pup
You cheer me upIf I hallucinate and am filled with fear
You comfort me with peace and cheerI will love you for eternity, don’t forget
My precious and dear Violetby Zachary Uram
(c) 2023 -
Biblical Exegesis: Catholic and Protestant Methodologies Compared

Scripture several times explicitly lists Jesus’ brothers and names them, as well as referencing sisters. Yet despite the clear evidence and witness of Scripture, Catholic interpreters will assert that Mary and Joseph never had sex (Mary has the status of a consecrated virgin who remained a virgin throughout her whole life) and thus deny that Mary and Joseph had any children after Jesus was born. This is once again despite and in opposition to the fact that Scripture explicitly says they had sex once Jesu was born.
As a Protestant I am not bound by any pre-existing stipulations or pronouncements of a Magisterium, I am free to engage in honest and open exegesis of the texts of Scripture. Catholics. on the other hand, come to the text loaded with pre-existing assumptions and presuppositions imposed on them, which color how they see the text.
It’s obvious, and very sad, Catholics need for Mary to be ever virgin/consecrated virgin, because if they let the biblical texts speak for themselves they will be left with an inescapable conundrum: either Scripture is wrong, or their exegesis is wrong and the Magisterium is not infallible. That would be untenable and unthinkable for the Catholic mind, so since it is straightjacketed by prior theological commitments it will inevitably fall into eisegesis when it comes to the texts referencing Mary’s children or Joseph and Mary having sex.
This restrictive process of interpretation which Catholics are bound by severely limits and hampers proper exegesis of the biblical texts.
Further the Catholic assertion that they possess an infallible Magisterium (teaching authority) is fallacious. No such thing exists. There are no infallible interpreters of Scripture.
It should be apparent that Catholics cannot engage in open, honest, and direct exegesis of Scripture. Literally every single Catholic doctrine of faith is subject to eisegesis due to their interpretive methodology.
Further, Catholics, by rejecting the principle of Sola Scriptura, lay themselves open to distortions of the text and eisegesis. They elevate tradition to the same level of authority as Scripture. This is very wicked and unbiblical. Nothing should have the same exalted status as the very Word of God! By being bound by Sola Scriptura we have a safeguard against eisegesis and adopting errant doctrines. Catholics on the other hand have no such safeguard.
-
Warp Speed

Going faster
Beyond reason or rhyme
Violating the laws of physics
One at a timeI’m going faster than light
You see
I have no
Terminal velocityAt first traveling this way
Was a shock
If you don’t understand
Don’t mockI navigate hyperspace
Like a pro
Carefully planning
Where I’ll goI’m also able to travel
Backwards and forwards in time
Oh yes the feeling
Is sublimePhased mind warping
Is the way I go
Racing across the universe
I ride the spacetime flowI am
The superluminal explorer
Oh the adventures I have
It’s not because of a disorderby Zachary Uram
(c) 2023 -
My Fractured Mind

I lost my mind you see
Yes, it happened to meTwas a score and three
Years ago, since I began my miseryI was struck down in my prime
It happened in an instant of timeOne day I woke up hearing voices
My mind was in piecesVisual hallucinations followed soon
I was now a loonI was in a schizoid state
Which isn’t greatI also suffer from major depression
I have no energy or motivationAn anxiety disorder ails me too
My sanity I did eschewMy view of reality is disjointed
And fracturedI have episodes that are dissociative
Where I zone out and reality is alternativeI also have delusions and PTSD
I want to fleeIt’s been a protracted struggle long and hard
I envy the simple life of a bee in the yardWell, not truly, but at least I can dream
My life is too extremeBut I don’t want to complain
Even though I have a broken brainGod has been so good to me
Christ set me free from sin and saved meThere are many hell bound with a whole mind
But they are spiritually blindPerhaps in struggling with mental illness
I’ve found a divine peace and stillnessAt Calvary Jesus bore every single mind malady
He knows my suffering and set me freeI have a great Savior Who knows my pain
One day I’ll have a glorified brainSo I’ll go on living, one day at a time
Thus ends my rhymeby Zachary Uram
(c) 2023

